Kumho Ecsta 712 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta 712 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 10 + 8,168 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–48

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta 712
Tire AKumho

Ecsta 712

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 10 reviews

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 48

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +27
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 55 (est.)77
    Reviews found online3771

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 55.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 71 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 44

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +40
    84
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 50 (est.)91
    Reviews found online3573

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 90.9 + 40% × 73.1 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 51

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +20
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 63 (est.)75
    Reviews found online3365

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.2 = 51

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 64.8 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta 712. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–15
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 59

    Treadwear

    Ecsta 712 +7
    52
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 62 (est.)45
    Reviews found online5463

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 62.5 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 34

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +37
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712Ecsta PS71
    Reviews found online3471
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta 712 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta 712Kumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 48 73
Dry 48 75
Wet 44 84
Comfort 51 71
Noise – 36
Treadwear 59 52
Handling (owners) 34 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta 712

Ecsta PS71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta 712

Pros

  • Highly competitive price point
  • Better-than-average tread life compared to some premium performance tires
  • Acceptable dry weather handling for casual driving

Cons

  • Dangerous and unpredictable wet weather traction
  • High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
  • Poor steering feedback and tendency for understeer/oversteer
All owner themes in the Ecsta 712 review

Tire B Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta 712

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta 712 B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—133
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta 712

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecsta 712 if treadwear matters most to you. Kumho Ecsta 712 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 84 vs 44 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 34 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 51 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta 712
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 84 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 71 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta 712, 59 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology