Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 10 reviews
Kumho Ecsta 712 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Kumho Ecsta 712 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 10 + 8,168 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–48
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
48
Dry
Ecsta PS71 +2775Why this score
Source Ecsta 712 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 55 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 37 71 Ecsta 712: 60% × 55.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 71 = 75
No road tests of dry for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
44
Wet
Ecsta PS71 +4084Why this score
Source Ecsta 712 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 50 (est.) 91 Reviews found online 35 73 Ecsta 712: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 90.9 + 40% × 73.1 = 84
No road tests of wet for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
51
Comfort
Ecsta PS71 +2071Why this score
Source Ecsta 712 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 33 65 Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.2 = 51
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 64.8 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta 712. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison36Why this score
Source Ecsta 712 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 15 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 36
No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
59
Treadwear
Ecsta 712 +752Why this score
Source Ecsta 712 Ecsta PS71 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 45 Reviews found online 54 63 Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59
Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 62.5 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
34
Handling (owners)
Ecsta PS71 +3771Why this score
Source Ecsta 712 Ecsta PS71 Reviews found online 34 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta 712 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 73 |
| Dry | 48 | 75 |
| Wet | 44 | 84 |
| Comfort | 51 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 36 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 34 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecsta 712
Ecsta PS71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta 712
Pros
- Highly competitive price point
- Better-than-average tread life compared to some premium performance tires
- Acceptable dry weather handling for casual driving
Cons
- Dangerous and unpredictable wet weather traction
- High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
- Poor steering feedback and tendency for understeer/oversteer
Tire B Ecsta PS71
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
- Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
- Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
- Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Kumho Ecsta 712
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
“Not exactly helpful but I've got Hankook winter tyres on my 330i and they're really good. mr wilks on here recommend Kumho Ecstas a couple of times so I got a set for my MC and I've been very pleased with them. And I got a set for £400 from Black Circles! ETA My Kumho Ecstas are also PS71.”
“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
Based on 24 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta 712 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 133 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta 712
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecsta 712 if treadwear matters most to you. Kumho Ecsta 712 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 84 vs 44 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 34 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 48 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 51 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 84 vs 44 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta PS71, 71 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta 712 or Ecsta PS71?
Kumho Ecsta 712, 59 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology