tirewheelguide

Kumho Ecsta 712 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta 712 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 10 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–48

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701 or Ecsta 712 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta 712
Tire AKumho

Ecsta 712

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 10 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 48

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +26
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 55 (est.)77
    Reviews found online3769

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 55.4 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 44

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +24
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 50 (est.)70
    Reviews found online3565

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    34
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online–10

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 51

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +12
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)62
    Reviews found online3363

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.2 = 51

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta 712. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–75
    Reviews found online–62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70

  6. 59

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 62 (est.)74
    Reviews found online5461

    Ecsta 712: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta 712. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 34

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +37
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta 712ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online3471
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta 712Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 48 70
Dry 48 74
Wet 44 68
Snow – 34
Comfort 51 63
Noise – 70
Treadwear 59 69
Handling (owners) 34 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta 712

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta 712

Pros

  • Highly competitive price point
  • Better-than-average tread life compared to some premium performance tires
  • Acceptable dry weather handling for casual driving

Cons

  • Dangerous and unpredictable wet weather traction
  • High levels of road noise and harsh ride quality
  • Poor steering feedback and tendency for understeer/oversteer
All owner themes in the Ecsta 712 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta 712

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Neutral

Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta 712 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—70
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta 712

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta 712 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 34 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 44 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 63 vs 51 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta 712
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta 712 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta 712 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta 712 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta 712 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 63 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta 712 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology