Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 27 reviews
Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 vs Michelin Primacy 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 27 + 195 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 3 is ahead, 71–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 67 · 195 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 20 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“I have just put a new set of Michelin Primacy 3 T0 Acoustics on and they have been faultless. Lots of grip, very quiet etc. They were also good last year in the snow and were from blackcircles for about £240 a tyre.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Primacy 3 +773Why this score
Source Ecsta HM KH31 Primacy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 65 70 Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
Primacy 3: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 70 = 73
No road tests of dry for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
Primacy 3 +472Why this score
Source Ecsta HM KH31 Primacy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 67 72 Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68
Primacy 3: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 72 = 72
No road tests of wet for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Comfort
Primacy 3 +268Why this score
Source Ecsta HM KH31 Primacy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 68 Ecsta HM KH31: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
Primacy 3: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.9 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta HM KH31 or Primacy 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Primacy 3 +567Why this score
Source Ecsta HM KH31 Primacy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 60 57 Ecsta HM KH31: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 62
Primacy 3: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 56.8 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta HM KH31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Primacy 3 +368Why this score
Source Ecsta HM KH31 Primacy 3 Reviews found online 65 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 | Michelin Primacy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 71 |
| Dry | 66 | 73 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Comfort | 66 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecsta HM KH31
Primacy 3
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ecsta HM KH31 | Primacy 3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #10/14 2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test | #1/16 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta HM KH31
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise and high levels of ride comfort
- Strong dry-weather handling and cornering confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip reported by some users
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear on certain vehicles
- Occasional complaints regarding sidewall durability and road hazard susceptibility
Tire B Primacy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low noise levels
- Strong dry grip and confident handling
- Smooth, refined high-speed stability and cruising capability
Cons
- Higher than average purchase price
- Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by many users
- Mixed feedback on wet weather performance, with some noting a lack of grip in standing water or snow
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Kumho Ecsta HM KH31
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Primacy 3
Community members generally view the Michelin Primacy 3 as a quiet, smooth, and capable grand touring tire, with several users highlighting the run-flat (ZP) version as superior in comfort to competing run-flats. However, some drivers report fast tread wear, a harsh ride compared to standard non-run-flat alternatives, and note that the model is older and increasingly replaced by newer generations like the Primacy 4.
“Is your tire size 235/55-18? You might like the Michelin Primacy 3 which is actually a good price for an 18" Michelin. They are summer tires, but that's OK if you have separate winter tires. The Goodyear Assurance Maxlife sounds like something that will last a long time. The Cooper Enduramax is good if you drive over potholes and curbs because it's supposed to be tougher”
“Continental DWS06 Plus non-runflats, going on my car next week. Have had OEM Michelin Primacy 3's and they are like driving on bricks. I also ordered an OEM donut spare and jack kit for the trunk. Jack kit goes in lower compartment, spare kept under the horizontal floor net (Coupe).”
“The Primacy3 ZP were installed today. Of course, they need a break-in period, but from some highway and city traffic, I'm already sold that these are the best replacement run-flat tires for our 18" size. The car now glides where it previously "sandpapered" its way down the road with the original harsh and noisy Pirellis. Bumps feel far more isolated. The reviews for DriveGuard have been mediocre, not great. These are far better to my senses. The 225/50-18 size is hard to find. Tire Rack carries the Primacy3 ZP, but not in that size. Another tire store in my area confused them with the non-runflat which Michelin has named the same...just Primacy3. Then, realized they couldn't get the ZP version. Very odd wholesale distribution pattern. Discount Tire was able to order them. First day, but very, very pleased. EDIT: My wife even noticed and she never notices anything about cars. She said the car felt smoother to her as a passenger!”
Based on 23 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 | B · Michelin Primacy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 42 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta HM KH31
Michelin Primacy 3
Winner: Michelin Primacy 3 — better dry, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy 3 scores 73 vs 66 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 3 scores 67 vs 62 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 3 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta HM KH31 or Primacy 3?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta HM KH31 or Primacy 3?
Michelin Primacy 3, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta HM KH31 or Primacy 3?
Michelin Primacy 3, 73 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta HM KH31 or Primacy 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta HM KH31 or Primacy 3?
Michelin Primacy 3, 67 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology