Tests 75 · 6 tests Owners 68 · 1,667 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Toyo Proxes TR1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 1 road tests and 1,667 + 903 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta HS51 is ahead, 72–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 903 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Ecsta HS51 +1559Why this score
Source Ecsta HS51 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests 77 53 Reviews found online 69 69 Ecsta HS51: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 69 = 74
Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 69.3 = 59
-
76
Wet
Ecsta HS51 +868Why this score
Source Ecsta HS51 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests 79 67 Reviews found online 72 70 Ecsta HS51: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 71.7 = 76
Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 70.1 = 68
-
68
Comfort
Ecsta HS51 +563Why this score
Source Ecsta HS51 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 67 59 Ecsta HS51: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 67.1 = 68
Proxes TR1: 40% × 68.1 + 60% × 59.1 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta HS51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
Proxes TR1 +268Why this score
Source Ecsta HS51 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests 65 68 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Ecsta HS51: 60% × 65.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 66
Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68
No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta HS51 or Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
Ecsta HS51 +763Why this score
Source Ecsta HS51 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests 73 ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 65 60 Ecsta HS51: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 64.9 = 70
Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Proxes TR1 +472Why this score
Source Ecsta HS51 Proxes TR1 Reviews found online 68 72 -
57
Efficiency
Proxes TR1 +1471Why this score
Source Ecsta HS51 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests 57 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta HS51 | Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 64 |
| Dry | 74 | 59 |
| Wet | 76 | 68 |
| Comfort | 68 | 63 |
| Noise | 66 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 57 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Ecsta HS51
64
/ 100
Proxes TR1
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ecsta HS51 | Proxes TR1 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #3/53 · 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test | 87% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #5/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 96% #6/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 99% #2/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 97% #6/53 · 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test | 82% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 97% #15/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 75% #20/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 94% #3/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/11 2021 Autonavigator Summer Tire Test R16 | #5/6 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta HS51
Pros
- Impressive wet and dry weather traction
- Excellent value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a wobbly or loose feeling during aggressive cornering
- Some users experienced faster-than-expected tread wear on the front axle
- Occasional complaints regarding poor steering feedback and high-speed handling at the limit
Tire B Proxes TR1
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier-one brands
- Attractive and aggressive directional tread design
Cons
- Noticeable road noise and humming sounds at certain speeds
- Soft sidewalls that can cause a slight squirm or delayed initial steering response
- Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear axles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Kumho Ecsta HS51
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Toyo Proxes TR1
Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.
r/subaru
·1 upvote ·2026-06-25
“Bekomme ich mit unterschiedliche Reifen Modelle Probleme mit dem Verteiler Getriebe? Hallo, ich habe mal eine Frage bezüglich Reifen und dem Verteilergetriebe. Ich habe vor ein paar Jahren einen gebrauchten Felgensatz gekauft auf dem Reifen aus dem Jahr 2016 waren Profiltiefe der Reifen war bei allen neuwertig. Anfang diesen Jahres habe ich mir dann hinten links einen Platten gefahren. Ich habe dann die Reifen hinten achsweise getauscht mit dem selben Reifen was verbaut war (neue toyo proxes tr1 Reifen. Unglücklicherweise habe ich jetzt wieder einen platten Reifen, allerdings vorne. Nun wollte ich wieder 2 neue Reifen für vorne bestellen (ebenfalls toyo proxes tr1). Leider läuft dieses Modell wohl aus und sind nicht mehr verfügbar. Meine Frage jetzt, kann ich andere Reifen Modelle nutzen (toyo comfort in den selben Maßen wie den Proxes tr1) oder sind diese problematisch? Vielen Dank im Voraus 🙂 Read more”
cliosport.net
·2019-12-19
“I had asymmetric 2 or possibly 3's on an impreza and they were a fantastic all rounder. The 5's will be going on my daily when i find a good deal!”
corvetteforum.com
“70l46 did you get yours mounted and balanced for that price? I picked mine up at tiredealsforless.com for $765.12 shipped. They had the best prices that I have seen.”
Top themes
#Wet grip performance#Soft sidewall stiffness#Affordable price point#Road noise issues#Ride comfort comparison#Handling at limit#T1R model confusion
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta HS51 | B · Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 27 | 61 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta HS51
64
/ 100
Toyo Proxes TR1
Winner: Kumho Ecsta HS51 — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Toyo Proxes TR1 if efficiency matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 74 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Toyo Proxes TR1 scores 71 vs 57 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 76 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 70 vs 63 on treadwear.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta HS51
Tire B · Toyo Proxes TR1
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta HS51 or Proxes TR1?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta HS51 or Proxes TR1?
Kumho Ecsta HS51, 76 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta HS51 or Proxes TR1?
Kumho Ecsta HS51, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Ecsta HS51 or Proxes TR1?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta HS51 or Proxes TR1?
Kumho Ecsta HS51, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta HS51 or Proxes TR1?
Kumho Ecsta HS51, 70 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Ecsta HS51 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo Proxes TR1, 71 vs 57 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology