Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta KH11 vs Nexen N Blue HD+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 6 + 82 owner reviews. How we score

N Blue HD+ is ahead, 71–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta KH11
Tire AKumho

Ecsta KH11

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 6 reviews

Nexen N Blue HD+
Tire BNexen

N Blue HD+

Summer

± 7

Tests 70 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 82 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Mid Range Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    N Blue HD+ +18
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KH11N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 59 (est.)74
    Reviews found online4771

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 46.5 = 54

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 70.5 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta KH11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 56

    Wet

    N Blue HD+ +17
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KH11N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 59 (est.)73
    Reviews found online5074

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 73.9 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta KH11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KH11N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online42–

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta KH11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    N Blue HD+ +16
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KH11N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4972

    Ecsta KH11: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.6 = 55

    N Blue HD+: 40% × 70 + 60% × 71.9 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KH11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 58

    Noise

    N Blue HD+ +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KH11N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)67
    Reviews found online46≈ 67 (est.)

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.1 = 58

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 67

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta KH11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for N Blue HD+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 59

    Treadwear

    N Blue HD+ +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KH11N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 62 (est.)64
    Reviews found online5567

    Ecsta KH11: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 64.5 + 40% × 67.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KH11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue HD+ +20
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KH11N Blue HD+
    Reviews found online5171
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta KH11N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–55
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta KH11 vs Nexen N Blue HD+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta KH11Nexen N Blue HD+
Relative Score 56 71
Dry 54 72
Wet 56 73
Snow 53 –
Comfort 55 71
Noise 58 67
Treadwear 59 66
Handling (owners) 51 71
Efficiency – 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecsta KH11

± 7

N Blue HD+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta KH11

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity with proper maintenance
  • Balanced performance in both wet and dry conditions for select users
  • Attractive cost compared to premium competitors like Pirelli and Michelin

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls leading to poor handling stability and a rolling sensation
  • Inconsistent or disappointing grip, particularly in wet weather
  • Rapid and unexpected tread wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the Ecsta KH11 review

Tire B N Blue HD+

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • High level of ride comfort and very low road noise
  • Reliable and stable grip in both dry and wet conditions for normal driving

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users
  • Vague handling and loss of predictability when pushed hard or cornered aggressively
  • Occasional reports of shoulder cracking or ruptures
All owner themes in the N Blue HD+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta KH11 B · Nexen N Blue HD+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3—
Rim diameters15″ – 18″—
Tread depth8.9/32″—
UTQG340 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta KH11

Nexen N Blue HD+

Winner: Nexen N Blue HD+ — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta KH11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 71 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 72 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 73 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 71 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta KH11
Tire B · Nexen N Blue HD+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta KH11 or N Blue HD+?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta KH11 or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 73 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta KH11 or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 72 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta KH11 or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 67 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta KH11 or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 71 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta KH11 or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 66 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology