Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 23 reviews
Kumho Ecsta PA31 vs Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 23 + 502 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta PA31 is ahead, 63–33
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 15 · 502 reviews
“I also found last night that this tire in my size (195/65R15) is the OEM tire for the 2009 Honda Civic DX-VP (and probably other configurations and model years close to that).”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Ecsta PA31 +3330Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 44 (est.) Reviews found online 61 10 Ecsta PA31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 60% × 43.7 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 30
No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
67
Wet
Ecsta PA31 +3433Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 42 (est.) Reviews found online 66 19 Ecsta PA31: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 60% × 42.2 (est.) + 40% × 19.1 = 33
No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
Ecsta PA31 +1940Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 52 21 Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 59
SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 21.4 = 40
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
59
Comfort
Ecsta PA31 +3029Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 55 10 Ecsta PA31: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 54.5 = 59
SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 40% × 58.3 (est.) + 60% × 10 = 29
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PA31 or SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 67 – Ecsta PA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
No road tests of noise for Ecsta PA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Ecsta PA31 +2635Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 48 (est.) Reviews found online 58 15 Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 61
SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 60% × 48.2 (est.) + 40% × 14.6 = 35
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
55
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecsta PA31 SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical Reviews found online 55 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PA31 | Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 33 |
| Dry | 63 | 30 |
| Wet | 67 | 33 |
| Snow | 59 | 40 |
| Comfort | 59 | 29 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 61 | 35 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecsta PA31
SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PA31
Pros
- Affordable price and high overall value
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong wet-weather grip and confidence
Cons
- Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
- Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
- Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
Tire B SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Kumho Ecsta PA31
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical
Community members generally consider the Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical an acceptable OEM tire with attractive budget pricing when found on sale. While users appreciate its overall performance, ride comfort, and noise levels, concerns are raised regarding rapid treadwear and limited expected mileage.
Based on 5 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PA31 | B · Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 7 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta PA31
Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA31 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 67 vs 33 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 63 vs 30 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 59 vs 29 on comfort.
Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 61 vs 35 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta PA31 or SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PA31 or SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical?
Kumho Ecsta PA31, 67 vs 33 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PA31 or SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical?
Kumho Ecsta PA31, 63 vs 30 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecsta PA31 or SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical?
Kumho Ecsta PA31, 59 vs 40 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PA31 or SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical?
Kumho Ecsta PA31, 59 vs 29 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecsta PA31 or SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical?
Kumho Ecsta PA31, 61 vs 35 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology