Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 165 reviews
Best test result: #7 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Azenis FK510 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 907 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 10 in 2018 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test (overall ranking)
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Azenis FK510 +674Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 68 76 -
68
Wet
Azenis FK510 +1583Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 87 Reviews found online 67 77 -
62
Snow
Ecsta PA51 +755Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Azenis FK510 Reviews found online 57 45 -
66
Comfort
Ecsta PA51 +1452Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 42 Reviews found online 63 68 -
69
Noise
Ecsta PA51 +168Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – 68 Reviews found online 72 68 -
71
Treadwear
Ecsta PA51 +566Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 72 Reviews found online 72 57 -
66
Handling
Azenis FK510 +571Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 Azenis FK510 Reviews found online 66 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PA51 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 70 |
| Dry | 68 | 74 |
| Wet | 68 | 83 |
| Snow | 62 | 55 |
| Comfort | 66 | 52 |
| Noise | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 66 |
| Handling | 66 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Ecsta PA51
70
/ 100
Azenis FK510
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Ecsta PA51 | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Other | 67% #11/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | +12.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 67% #7/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | 20% #5/10 · 2018 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | +46.7 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PA51
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Tire B Azenis FK510
Pros
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Kumho Ecsta PA51
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Falken Azenis FK510
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
r/TeslaModelS
·3 upvotes ·2025-11-25
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
r/TeslaModel3
·1 upvote ·2023-09-23
“Got a full set of FK510 for my model 3 and I luv em, the low profile really shows off the red performance calibers.”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-03-09
“The Falken Azenis FK510 would be my choice of what you have listed, not that either the Conti or Nitto is a bad tire... but on my Corvette I had Nexen N'Fera SU1 and absolutely loved them and drove rather... aggressively.”
Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance
Based on 25 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 13 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10.5/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PA51
70
/ 100
Falken Azenis FK510
Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PA51 if comfort, snow and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 66 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 62 vs 55 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 74 vs 68 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.