tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Bridgestone Turanza T001 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 259 + 2,187 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Ecsta PS31 66, Turanza T001 65.

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS31 Check price on Amazon · Turanza T001
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS31

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews

Bridgestone Turanza T001
Tire BBridgestone

Turanza T001

Summer

± 8

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 57 · 2,187 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Bridgestone turanza t001 do I need to replace them with these small cracks ? It’s 4 year old since production and is it dangerous to travel alot with these small cracks?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Turanza T001 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)69
    Reviews found online6061

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    Turanza T001: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 60.7 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Turanza T001 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)76
    Reviews found online6863

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    Turanza T001: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 63.4 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online50–

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS31 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6559

    Ecsta PS31: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66

    Turanza T001: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS31 or Turanza T001. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PS31 +10
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6548

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 65

    Turanza T001: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza T001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS31 +11
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Turanza T001
    Reviews found online6958
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Turanza T001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–62
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Bridgestone Turanza T001
Relative Score 66 65
Dry 63 66
Wet 69 71
Snow 58 –
Comfort 66 62
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 65 55
Handling (owners) 69 58
Efficiency – 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Ecsta PS31

± 8

Turanza T001

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS31

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS31 review

Tire B Turanza T001

Pros

  • Good dry grip and stable highway handling
  • Comfortable ride quality with low road noise on many surfaces
  • Solid steering feedback and direct road feel

Cons

  • Accelerated and uneven tread wear, particularly on front or drive wheels
  • Inconsistent or poor wet grip, with several users reporting aquaplaning risks
  • Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or firm ride over uneven surfaces
All owner themes in the Turanza T001 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS31

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Neutral

Community discussions around the Bridgestone Turanza T001 largely center on replacement decisions, tire longevity, and tread aging. Users note that the tire provides a good balance of comfort, durability, and low road noise compared to sportier alternatives, though owners frequently question surface cracking after four years of use.

r/CarTalkUK ·1 upvote ·2022-08-08

“Bridgestone turanza T001 and it’s 4 year old so do I need to change it or just wait for another year the cracks don’t seem to be deep to me so I need an expert on that it drives like it does normally doesn’t leak any air and the grip is fine”
r/tires ·8 upvotes ·2022-08-18

“Bridgestone turanza t001 do I need to replace them with these small cracks ? It’s 4 year old since production and is it dangerous to travel alot with these small cracks?”
r/CarsIndia ·8 upvotes ·2023-01-27

“Just got a new set of tyres - Bridgestone Turanza T001 215/60/R16 at 77k kms.”
Top themes
#tread wear and longevity#surface cracking concerns#ride comfort and noise#tire replacement options#comparisons with performance tires

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Bridgestone Turanza T001
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2137
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG460 A A—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Bridgestone Turanza T001

Too close to call: Kumho Ecsta PS31 and Bridgestone Turanza T001 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta PS31 is stronger on handling, treadwear and comfort. Bridgestone Turanza T001 is stronger on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 69 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 65 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 66 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza T001
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS31 or Turanza T001?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS31 or Turanza T001?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS31 or Turanza T001?

Bridgestone Turanza T001, 66 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS31 or Turanza T001?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS31 or Turanza T001?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 65 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology