tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Dunlop SP Sport LM705 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 259 + 39 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Ecsta PS31 and SP Sport LM705 are level at 65.

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS31 Check price on Amazon · SP Sport LM705
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS31

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    SP Sport LM705 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6066

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Ecsta PS31 +7
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6859

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    SP Sport LM705 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5057

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 62

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    SP Sport LM705 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6571

    Ecsta PS31: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66

    SP Sport LM705: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Ecsta PS31 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6756

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 67

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    SP Sport LM705 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6568

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 65

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS31 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31SP Sport LM705
    Reviews found online6966
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Relative Score 65 65
Dry 63 67
Wet 69 62
Snow 58 62
Comfort 66 70
Noise 67 62
Treadwear 65 67
Handling (owners) 69 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Ecsta PS31

± 8

SP Sport LM705

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS31

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS31 review

Tire B SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available216
Rim diameters15″ – 18″16″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG460 A A—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Too close to call: Kumho Ecsta PS31 and Dunlop SP Sport LM705 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta PS31 is stronger on wet and noise. Dunlop SP Sport LM705 is stronger on dry, snow and comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 69 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 62 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 67 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 62 vs 58 on snow.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 69 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 67 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 62 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS31 or SP Sport LM705?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology