tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 259 + 79 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS31 is ahead, 65–59

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS31

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire BKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 79 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Ecsta PS31 +4
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6054

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 63

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Ecsta PS31 +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6859

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    Solus TA31: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    Ecsta PS31 +2
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4947

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 58

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS31 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6458

    Ecsta PS31: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.9 = 65

    Solus TA31: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    Ecsta PS31 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6661

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 66

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PS31 +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6554

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS31 +14
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31Solus TA31
    Reviews found online6854
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Kumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 65 59
Dry 63 59
Wet 68 62
Snow 58 56
Comfort 65 61
Noise 66 64
Treadwear 65 59
Handling (owners) 68 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Ecsta PS31

± 7

Solus TA31

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS31

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS31 review

Tire B Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2122
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9.5/32″
UTQG460 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Kumho Solus TA31

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 68 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 68 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 65 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 63 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 68 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 63 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 56 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS31 or Solus TA31?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 65 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology