Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 259 reviews
Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta PS31 is ahead, 65–42
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 30 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Ecsta PS31 +2044Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 63 31 -
69
Wet
Ecsta PS31 +3039Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 68 29 -
58
Snow
Ecsta PS31 +1147Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 50 31 -
67
Comfort
Ecsta PS31 +2245Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 65 20 -
67
Noise
Ecsta PS31 +1651Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 66 27 -
65
Treadwear
Ecsta PS31 +1748Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 65 35 -
67
Handling
Ecsta PS31 +4225Why this score
Source Ecsta PS31 BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 67 25
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS31 | Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 42 |
| Dry | 64 | 44 |
| Wet | 69 | 39 |
| Snow | 58 | 47 |
| Comfort | 67 | 45 |
| Noise | 67 | 51 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 48 |
| Handling | 67 | 25 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecsta PS31
BluEarth S34
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PS31
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
- Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
Tire B BluEarth S34
Pros
- Acceptable dry traction for standard commuting
- Low rolling resistance design
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance and traction
- High levels of road noise
- Mediocre handling characteristics
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 | B · Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 21 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 460 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Ecsta PS31
Yokohama BluEarth S34
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 25 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 69 vs 39 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 67 vs 45 on comfort.
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 64 vs 44 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.