Tests 76 · 2 tests Owners 71 · 430 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test (curved aquaplaning)
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 8 road tests and 430 + 1,068 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta Sport PS72 is ahead, 84–75
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 8 tests Owners 83 · 1,068 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))
“I’m on the Kumho sport ps72 and in the dry on road they are great, wet road- great, dry track also great but on wet track; a little unpredictable.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
Ecsta Sport PS72 +1086Why this score
Source Ecsta PS71 SUV Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 8 tests 79 87 Reviews found online ≈ 73 (est.) 85 Ecsta PS71 SUV: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 72.6 (est.) = 76
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 85.3 = 86
No owner ratings of dry for Ecsta PS71 SUV. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
81
Wet
Ecsta Sport PS72 +788Why this score
Source Ecsta PS71 SUV Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 8 tests 83 88 Reviews found online ≈ 77 (est.) 88 Ecsta PS71 SUV: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 77.3 (est.) = 81
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 87.5 = 88
No owner ratings of wet for Ecsta PS71 SUV. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison68Why this score
Source Ecsta PS71 SUV Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 58 Reviews found online – 75 Ecsta Sport PS72: 40% × 57.9 + 60% × 75.4 = 68
-
49
Noise
Ecsta Sport PS72 +1564Why this score
Source Ecsta PS71 SUV Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 7 tests 37 63 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Ecsta PS71 SUV: 60% × 37.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 49
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71 SUV or Ecsta Sport PS72. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison73Why this score
Source Ecsta PS71 SUV Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 70 Reviews found online – 78 Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 78 = 73
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison86Why this score
Source Ecsta PS71 SUV Ecsta Sport PS72 Reviews found online – 86 -
54
Efficiency
Ecsta Sport PS72 +1771Why this score
Source Ecsta PS71 SUV Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests 54 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV | Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 84 |
| Dry | 76 | 86 |
| Wet | 81 | 88 |
| Comfort | – | 68 |
| Noise | 49 | 64 |
| Treadwear | – | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 86 |
| Efficiency | 54 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Ecsta PS71 SUV
84
/ 100
Ecsta Sport PS72
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ecsta PS71 SUV | Ecsta Sport PS72 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #4/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 95% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #7/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 99% #3/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 88% #6/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 94% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #7/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 96% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 93% #4/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% #6/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 96% #8/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 99% #5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 96% #8/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 77% #7/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 82% #12/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 82% #9/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 69% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 99% #4/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 99% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 87% #6/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 94% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 89% #3/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 93% #4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/10 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | #7/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PS71 SUV
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip
- Great value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise and quiet highway ride
Cons
- A few users reported higher-than-expected road noise
- Occasional complaints about faster-than-desired tread wear on heavy SUVs
- Slight tendency to wander in very cold temperatures
Tire B Ecsta Sport PS72
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to tier-one premium brands
- Strong and predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Quieter road noise and high ride comfort relative to other performance tires
Cons
- Occasional reports of out-of-round tires causing persistent vibrations at highway speeds
- Stiffer sidewalls can result in a firmer ride or slight tracking issues when cold
- Some users noted faster-than-expected wear under aggressive, spirited driving conditions
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Community sentiment toward the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is largely positive, with drivers praising its impressive dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and low cabin noise compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. Most owners view it as an outstanding value proposition, offering near-flagship performance at a significantly lower price point. Minor criticisms focus on potential treadwear longevity, lack of rim protection, mixed feedback on highway noise, and occasional wheel balance or vibration issues.
civicxi.com
·2026-01-19
“Anyone else running these tires? Is it possible the tire(s) out of round? New hypergram wheels/new tires w/ aluminum hubcentric rings. Has vibrations, but most noticed front right. Balanced again same thing. Took the hub rings off with significant decrease but still there. Will try again with plastic rings followed by swapping wheels front to rear. If still going on will have to live with it”
r/elektrischrijden
·1 upvote ·2026-09-02
“Ik heb nog een paar nieuwe banden liggen voor die maat. Continental PremiumContact 7. Had je voor heel weinig mogen hebben. Die zijn echt wel beter dan die Hankooks. Overigens hoeft een goede band niet heel duur te zijn. Ik was zelf niet tevreden mer Hankook. De laatste nieuwe banden die ik heb laten monteren waren Kumho's Ecsta sport PS72. Die zijn weliswaar goedkoop, maar komen uitstekend uit veel testen. Ze hebben ook echt meer grip dan de Hankooks en Vredesteins die ik hiervoor had.”
r/F30
·6 upvotes ·2026-06-07
“Michelin PS5 vs Continental SC 7 vs Kumho PS72 for 437 wheels Looking for new tires for my F30 330i on 437M wheels (225/40R19 & 255/35R19). Main priorities are comfort, steering feel, low noise, and good grip for spirited driving. I’ve previously run Michelin PS5 and loved them, although they got a bit noisy over time. Now I’m deciding between: Michelin PS5 Continental SportContact 7 Kumho PS72 The Kumhos are much cheaper and reviews seem very positive. Are they really close to the PS5/SC7, or is it worth spending more?”
Top themes
#value for money#dry and wet grip#low road noise#Michelin PS4 comparison#balancing and vibration#ride comfort compliance#treadwear longevity
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV | B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 50 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.4/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 320 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
84
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Winner: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — better efficiency, noise and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 71 vs 54 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 64 vs 49 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 88 vs 81 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecsta PS71 SUV or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS71 SUV or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 88 vs 81 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS71 SUV or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 86 vs 76 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Ecsta PS71 SUV or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 64 vs 49 on our noise score.
Which rolls more easily, Ecsta PS71 SUV or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 71 vs 54 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology