tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 3 road tests and 8,168 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 leads, 68–64 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS71 or N Fera SU1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

± 6

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 7

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 63 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +16
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests7855
    Reviews found online7264

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 72.2 = 75

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.2 = 59

  2. 85

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +21
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 2 tests9262
    Reviews found online7567

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 74.8 = 85

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.3 = 64

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–50

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests7566
    Reviews found online6666

    Ecsta PS71: 40% × 75.3 + 60% × 65.8 = 70

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65.5 = 66

  5. 36

    Noise

    N Fera SU1 +33
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 1 tests1569
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)70

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 36

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.8 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 51

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +15
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests4570
    Reviews found online6159

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 60.7 = 51

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 66

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Fera SU1
    Reviews found online7366
  8. 48

    Efficiency

    N Fera SU1 +28
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests4876
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS71Nexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 68 64
Dry 75 59
Wet 85 64
Snow – 58
Comfort 70 66
Noise 36 69
Treadwear 51 66
Handling (owners) 73 66
Efficiency 48 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Ecsta PS71

± 7

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta PS71N Fera SU1ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #9/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout 94% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #12/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 95% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 92% #2/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 95% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% #1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 98% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #2/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 95% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 89% #4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 94% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 97% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 97% #17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 83% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 99% #2/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/52 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout #5/6 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

r/TeslaUK ·2 upvotes ·2026-08-28

“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
bimmerforums.co.uk ·1 upvote ·2024-05-05

“On Blackcircles all the 245/40 R19 ditch finders cost around £100 and have a poor wet grip & all the decent mid range cost around £170 and have A rated wet grip. Would you risk it for £240? I know I wouldn't. The cheapest A wet rated is a Kuhmo Ecsta PS71 at £136 if you really want to keep the cost down. If you want a relatively soft comfortable tyre then a Hankook S1 Evo 3 is an excellent choice.”
r/tires ·5 upvotes ·2022-10-17

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Fera SU1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13397
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common6666

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Nexen N Fera SU1

Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if noise, efficiency and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 69 vs 36 on noise.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 76 vs 48 on efficiency.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS71 or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS71 or N Fera SU1?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS71 or N Fera SU1?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PS71 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 69 vs 36 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS71 or N Fera SU1?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS71 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ecsta PS71 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 76 vs 48 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology