tirewheelguide

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 8,168 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Ecsta PS71 and Advan Neova AD08 are level at 70.

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS71 Check price on Amazon · Advan Neova AD08
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests77≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7180

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 71 = 75

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 84

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +15
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests91≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7369

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 90.9 + 40% × 73.1 = 84

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6567

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 64.8 = 71

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 36

    Noise

    Advan Neova AD08 +31
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests15≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)68

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 36

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    Advan Neova AD08 +11
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests45≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6361

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 62.5 = 52

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +8
    79
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7179
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS71Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 70 70
Dry 75 75
Wet 84 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 71 68
Noise 36 67
Treadwear 52 63
Handling (owners) 71 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta PS71

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta PS71Advan Neova AD08ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/52 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

r/tires ·5 upvotes ·2022-10-17

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
z4-forum.com ·2023-01-29

“Not exactly helpful but I've got Hankook winter tyres on my 330i and they're really good. mr wilks on here recommend Kumho Ecstas a couple of times so I got a set for my MC and I've been very pleased with them. And I got a set for £400 from Black Circles! ETA My Kumho Ecstas are also PS71.”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2024-10-25

“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available133—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Too close to call: Kumho Ecsta PS71 and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta PS71 is stronger on wet and comfort. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on noise, treadwear and handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 67 vs 36 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 84 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 63 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 71 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS71 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS71 or Advan Neova AD08?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 84 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS71 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PS71 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 67 vs 36 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS71 or Advan Neova AD08?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS71 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 63 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology