Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 4 road tests and 1,068 + 992 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta Sport PS72 is ahead, 81–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Tire AKumho

Ecsta Sport PS72

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 8 tests Owners 83 · 1,068 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))

“I’m on the Kumho sport ps72 and in the dry on road they are great, wet road- great, dry track also great but on wet track; a little unpredictable.”

Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
Tire BNankang

Sportnex AS-2+

Summer

± 7

Tests 58 · 4 tests Owners 43 · 992 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +41
    45
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Sportnex AS-2+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 4 tests8743
    Reviews found online8548

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 85.3 = 86

    Sportnex AS-2+: 60% × 43.3 + 40% × 48.2 = 45

  2. 88

    Wet

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +27
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Sportnex AS-2+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 4 tests8871
    Reviews found online8846

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 87.5 = 88

    Sportnex AS-2+: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 46.2 = 61

  3. 68

    Comfort

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +19
    49
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Sportnex AS-2+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests58≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7540

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 40% × 57.9 + 60% × 75.4 = 68

    Sportnex AS-2+: 40% × 62.9 (est.) + 60% × 39.8 = 49

    No road tests of comfort for Sportnex AS-2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 64

    Noise

    Sportnex AS-2+ +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Sportnex AS-2+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests6363
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64

    Sportnex AS-2+: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta Sport PS72 or Sportnex AS-2+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 73

    Treadwear

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +26
    47
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Sportnex AS-2+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online7834

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 78 = 73

    Sportnex AS-2+: 60% × 54.8 (est.) + 40% × 34.1 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Sportnex AS-2+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 86

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +44
    42
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Sportnex AS-2+
    Reviews found online8642
  7. 71

    Efficiency

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta Sport PS72Sportnex AS-2+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7167
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 vs Nankang Sportnex AS-2+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta Sport PS72Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
Relative Score 81 52
Dry 86 45
Wet 88 61
Comfort 68 49
Noise 64 65
Treadwear 73 47
Handling (owners) 86 42
Efficiency 71 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Ecsta Sport PS72

± 7

Sportnex AS-2+

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta Sport PS72Sportnex AS-2+ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? 88% #8/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #3/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test 97% #8/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 88% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test 50% #8/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 93% #4/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? 93% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 96% #8/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 94% #7/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 98% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 100% #1/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 89% #5/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 82% #12/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 92% #4/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test #7/8 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta Sport PS72

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Strong and predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Quieter road noise and high ride comfort relative to other performance tires

Cons

  • Occasional reports of out-of-round tires causing persistent vibrations at highway speeds
  • Stiffer sidewalls can result in a firmer ride or slight tracking issues when cold
  • Some users noted faster-than-expected wear under aggressive, spirited driving conditions
All owner themes in the Ecsta Sport PS72 review

Tire B Sportnex AS-2+

Pros

  • Strong value for money, with many reviewers saying it performs close to or better than premium tyres costing considerably more
  • Good to excellent wet grip and water dispersion for most users, with some preferring it to Continental SportContact 5 and Bridgestone Potenza
  • Confident dry grip, braking and steering feedback, especially once the tyre is warm

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear is the most common complaint, with several reviewers reporting 4,000–13,000 miles of life and tyres reaching the wear limit or wearing in the centre
  • Inconsistent wet performance: a few reviewers described slides, aquaplaning, ABS activation and poor traction, in stark contrast to the majority view
  • Durability and quality concerns, including sidewall bulges, side-wall cracking, peeling and blowouts within months
All owner themes in the Sportnex AS-2+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is largely positive, with drivers praising its impressive dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and low cabin noise compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. Most owners view it as an outstanding value proposition, offering near-flagship performance at a significantly lower price point. Minor criticisms focus on potential treadwear longevity, lack of rim protection, mixed feedback on highway noise, and occasional wheel balance or vibration issues.

civicxi.com ·2026-01-19

“Anyone else running these tires? Is it possible the tire(s) out of round? New hypergram wheels/new tires w/ aluminum hubcentric rings. Has vibrations, but most noticed front right. Balanced again same thing. Took the hub rings off with significant decrease but still there. Will try again with plastic rings followed by swapping wheels front to rear. If still going on will have to live with it”

r/elektrischrijden ·1 upvote ·2026-09-02

“Ik heb nog een paar nieuwe banden liggen voor die maat. Continental PremiumContact 7. Had je voor heel weinig mogen hebben. Die zijn echt wel beter dan die Hankooks. Overigens hoeft een goede band niet heel duur te zijn. Ik was zelf niet tevreden mer Hankook. De laatste nieuwe banden die ik heb laten monteren waren Kumho's Ecsta sport PS72. Die zijn weliswaar goedkoop, maar komen uitstekend uit veel testen. Ze hebben ook echt meer grip dan de Hankooks en Vredesteins die ik hiervoor had.”

r/F30 ·6 upvotes ·2026-06-07

“Michelin PS5 vs Continental SC 7 vs Kumho PS72 for 437 wheels Looking for new tires for my F30 330i on 437M wheels (225/40R19 & 255/35R19). Main priorities are comfort, steering feel, low noise, and good grip for spirited driving. I’ve previously run Michelin PS5 and loved them, although they got a bit noisy over time. Now I’m deciding between: Michelin PS5 Continental SportContact 7 Kumho PS72 The Kumhos are much cheaper and reviews seem very positive. Are they really close to the PS5/SC7, or is it worth spending more?”

Top themes
#value for money#dry and wet grip#low road noise#Michelin PS4 comparison#balancing and vibration#ride comfort compliance#treadwear longevity

Based on 33 community posts

Tire B

Nankang Sportnex AS-2+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 B · Nankang Sportnex AS-2+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available50—
Rim diameters17″ – 21″—
Tread depth9.4/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Nankang Sportnex AS-2+

Winner: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — better handling, dry and wet. Where the Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 42 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 45 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 88 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 73 vs 47 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Tire B · Nankang Sportnex AS-2+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta Sport PS72 or Sportnex AS-2+?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta Sport PS72 or Sportnex AS-2+?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 88 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta Sport PS72 or Sportnex AS-2+?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 86 vs 45 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta Sport PS72 or Sportnex AS-2+?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta Sport PS72 or Sportnex AS-2+?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 68 vs 49 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta Sport PS72 or Sportnex AS-2+?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 73 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ecsta Sport PS72 or Sportnex AS-2+?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 71 vs 67 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology