Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 vs Michelin CrossClimate — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 2 road tests and 4,207 + 152 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate is ahead, 74–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Tire AKumho

Solus 4S HA32

All Season

± 7

Tests 71 · 5 tests Owners 57 · 4,207 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wear)

“They have been great so far. Unfortunately, only minor snow storms since they were installed but so far so good . Very quiet and predictable handling.”

Michelin CrossClimate
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate

All Season

± 6

Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 152 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    CrossClimate +14
    76
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests6878
    Reviews found online5374

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 52.7 = 62

    CrossClimate: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 73.9 = 76

  2. 70

    Wet

    CrossClimate +6
    76
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests7775
    Reviews found online6178

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 61.2 = 70

    CrossClimate: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 78 = 76

  3. 67

    Snow

    CrossClimate +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests7171
    Reviews found online6266

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 71 + 40% × 62 = 67

    CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 65.6 = 69

  4. 61

    Comfort

    CrossClimate +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5776

    Solus 4S HA32: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 56.5 = 61

    CrossClimate: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 76.3 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    Solus 4S HA32 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7471
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71

    CrossClimate: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate +10
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests6974
    Reviews found online5675

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 69.4 + 40% × 55.6 = 64

    CrossClimate: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 74.8 = 74

  7. 52

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate +21
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32CrossClimate
    Reviews found online5273
  8. 54

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate +22
    76
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests5476
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 vs Michelin CrossClimate: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus 4S HA32Michelin CrossClimate
Relative Score 65 74
Dry 62 76
Wet 70 76
Snow 67 69
Comfort 61 74
Noise 71 69
Treadwear 64 74
Handling (owners) 52 73
Efficiency 54 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus 4S HA32

± 6

CrossClimate

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategorySolus 4S HA32CrossClimateΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% #16/35 · 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview 99% #2/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #8/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 90% #7/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% #13/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 94% #4/11 · 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 86% #13/35 · 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview 87% #9/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 92% #14/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 96% #4/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 94% #7/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 91% #5/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 97% #11/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 99% #2/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #7/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #1/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 100% #1/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 91% #4/10 · 2017 All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 87% #8/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #2/16 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test #4/10 2017 All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 100% #1/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 65% #8/10 · 2017 All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #12/35 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview #9/9 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus 4S HA32

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium alternatives
  • Good grip and confidence-inspiring performance in wet and winter conditions
  • Comfortable ride quality that effectively absorbs road imperfections and potholes

Cons

  • Some users reported faster-than-expected tread wear or peeling
  • Road noise can increase or become prominent in hot weather or as the tires age
  • Dry cornering and high-temperature performance lack the sharpness of dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the Solus 4S HA32 review

Tire B CrossClimate

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable traction in light snow and cold conditions

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and retain small stones in the tread pattern
  • Noticeable drop in performance as tread depth decreases
  • Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the CrossClimate review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Solus 4S HA32

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 is mixed, with users appreciating its budget-friendly pricing, decent winter capability with 3PMSF rating, and low road noise. However, tread life and wear rate draw frequent criticism, with multiple owners reporting rapid degradation and edge wear sooner than expected. It is largely viewed as an accessible lower-tier or entry-level all-weather alternative to premium options like the Michelin CrossClimate.

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2023-09-05

“Get the CC2 if they aren't fucked up. That said, my CX-9 came with the Kumho HA32 and they were surprisingly good in the winter. Their tread is shit now after about 60k so I'll be replacing them with new CC2s, but overall I can't complain about the tire.”

r/Hyundai ·4 upvotes ·2026-07-17

“Best Affordable Tires Hello! I need to get all four tires replaced on my 2019 Hyundai ELANTRA SEL and I’m looking for an affordable All Weather tire recommendations. Car might see three big days of snow (based in Kansas but probably going to be out of state when that weather is occurring). Other than that, just mild flurry’s, nothing that really sticks. It’s really hard with the budget we have which is around $600 for all 4. Not sure if we’re gonna find any good ones within that range but thought I’d ask people who know what they’re talking about before I just go with the cheapest tire I can find and pray I don’t spin out lol. TYIA! Edit/Update: Thank you to everyone who replied! I ended up going with Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32 tires. I know they’re not the greatest but since I will most likely be out of Kansas when they have their heavy snow winter weather we just needed some good tires for basically just dry road and rain👏 They were cheaper at Walmart and used the American Tires price match to get them for cheaper! Would’ve gotten them installed through Walmart to save but just in case something happens in Kansas the Discount Tires is more accessible and with tire coverage will be a cheaper repairs. Thank you again! Read more”

bobistheoilguy.com ·6 upvotes ·2026-05-06

“They have been great so far. Unfortunately, only minor snow storms since they were installed but so far so good . Very quiet and predictable handling.”

Top themes
#tread wear longevity#winter snow traction#budget friendly pricing#all weather classification#road noise comfort#uneven edge wear

Based on 29 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus 4S HA32 B · Michelin CrossClimate
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available106—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus 4S HA32

Michelin CrossClimate

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate — better efficiency, handling and dry. Where the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 54 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate scores 73 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate scores 74 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate?

Which is better in the wet, Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 74 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 74 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Solus 4S HA32 or CrossClimate?

Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 54 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology