Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 32 road tests and 4,207 + 21,600 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 5 tests Owners 57 · 4,207 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wear)
“They have been great so far. Unfortunately, only minor snow storms since they were installed but so far so good . Very quiet and predictable handling.”
Tests 87 · 32 tests Owners 87 · 21,600 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“Michelin CrossClimate 2 after 31.000 kilometers I have those Michelin CrossClimate 2 (EU version, made in Spain) for 26 months now and 31.000 kilometers on a heavy Mercedes EQE, the rears are still good but the front tyres are starting to give up on the shoulders. Usual tyre pressure is 2.8 bars, there is still some good tread left on the middle of the tyre. Steering feeling on the snow is also not as good as it used to be. Overall very happy with those tyres, I’ll have to decide between the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the CrossClimate 3 Sport (sadly the 3 isn’t available in 255/45 R19) to replace them this year. We have the Pirelli Scorpion SF3 on our second car. Given the car and my usage, I give priority to snow braking, rolling resistance, silence and longevity. I lost a bit of range, comfort and steering engagement when I swapped the factory Bridgestone Turanza T005 for the CrossClimate 2, but in general nothing to call-out.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 30 tests | 68 | 99 |
| Reviews found online | 53 | 89 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 90% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 99% | 100% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 52.7 = 62
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.1 + 40% × 88.5 = 95
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 30 tests | 77 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 92 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 98% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 90% | 92% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 92% | 94% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 61.2 = 70
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 26 tests | 71 | 99 |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 78 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 95% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 97% | 99% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 88% | 100% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 71 + 40% × 62 = 67
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.9 + 40% × 78.4 = 91
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests | ≈ 67 (est.) | 65 |
| Reviews found online | 57 | 87 |
Solus 4S HA32: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 56.5 = 61
CrossClimate 2: 40% × 65.1 + 60% × 86.5 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Solus 4S HA32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 19 tests | 74 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 83 |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 99% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 82.7 = 80
No owner ratings of noise for Solus 4S HA32. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 7 tests | 69 | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 87 |
| Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 74% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 69.4 + 40% × 55.6 = 64
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 87 = 83
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 52 | 82 |
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 22 tests | 54 | 90 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 87% | 99% |
| Category | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 87 |
| Dry | 62 | 95 |
| Wet | 70 | 87 |
| Snow | 67 | 91 |
| Comfort | 61 | 78 |
| Noise | 71 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 83 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 82 |
| Efficiency | 54 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Solus 4S HA32
CrossClimate 2
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Kumho Solus 4S HA32 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin CrossClimate 2 4 times.
| Discipline | Category | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% | 100% | −9.6 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 100% | −1.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 95% | 98% | −3.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% | 92% | −2.1 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 92% | 94% | −1.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 95% | 95% | −0.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% | 99% | −1.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 88% | 100% | −12.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 99% | +0.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 100% | 74% | +25.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% | 99% | −12.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 96% | 61% | +35.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #2/16 | #10/16 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Value | Cost | 100% | 47% | +53.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/35 | #3/35 | – | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 is mixed, with users appreciating its budget-friendly pricing, decent winter capability with 3PMSF rating, and low road noise. However, tread life and wear rate draw frequent criticism, with multiple owners reporting rapid degradation and edge wear sooner than expected. It is largely viewed as an accessible lower-tier or entry-level all-weather alternative to premium options like the Michelin CrossClimate.
“Get the CC2 if they aren't fucked up. That said, my CX-9 came with the Kumho HA32 and they were surprisingly good in the winter. Their tread is shit now after about 60k so I'll be replacing them with new CC2s, but overall I can't complain about the tire.”
“Best Affordable Tires Hello! I need to get all four tires replaced on my 2019 Hyundai ELANTRA SEL and I’m looking for an affordable All Weather tire recommendations. Car might see three big days of snow (based in Kansas but probably going to be out of state when that weather is occurring). Other than that, just mild flurry’s, nothing that really sticks. It’s really hard with the budget we have which is around $600 for all 4. Not sure if we’re gonna find any good ones within that range but thought I’d ask people who know what they’re talking about before I just go with the cheapest tire I can find and pray I don’t spin out lol. TYIA! Edit/Update: Thank you to everyone who replied! I ended up going with Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32 tires. I know they’re not the greatest but since I will most likely be out of Kansas when they have their heavy snow winter weather we just needed some good tires for basically just dry road and rain👏 They were cheaper at Walmart and used the American Tires price match to get them for cheaper! Would’ve gotten them installed through Walmart to save but just in case something happens in Kansas the Discount Tires is more accessible and with tire coverage will be a cheaper repairs. Thank you again! Read more”
“They have been great so far. Unfortunately, only minor snow storms since they were installed but so far so good . Very quiet and predictable handling.”
Based on 29 community posts
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”
“I replaced the factory Continentals at 9,258 miles at the end of August 2023 with the stock size 225/65R17 Michelin CrossClimate 2's. I waited until the local tire shop had a sale and had these mounted/balanced for under $800. 348 days, 10,004 miles and 4 seasons have passed since then. I spend much of my time around "town" with speed limits under 55 while also having a handful of longer highway drives. These are the closest thing to a "no-compromise" all season tire that I can imagine. They are smooth, quiet and have incredible grip in all weather conditions. Snow, rain, etc. Admittedly, I have not taken my FWD Maverick through any meaningful amount of mud. Maybe there is a tire better suited to this. There are also certainly performance oriented tires that will outperform this tire when it is hot and dry. Last, and certainly not least - there does not seem to be any fuel economy change. I have tracked every tank before and after these tires. Both my best (48.5MPG) and worst (27MPG) full tanks have happened since these were installed. 38.8 overall.”
“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”
Based on 762 community posts
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus 4S HA32 | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 106 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 20″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 59 | 59 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better efficiency, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 54 on efficiency.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 62 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 52 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 67 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 70 on our wet score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 62 on our dry score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 67 on our snow score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 80 vs 71 on our noise score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 78 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 83 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 54 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
