Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 33 road tests and 4,307 + 21,761 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 5 tests Owners 57 · 4,307 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wear)
“They have been great so far. Unfortunately, only minor snow storms since they were installed but so far so good . Very quiet and predictable handling.”
Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,761 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“We downsized from 21” stock on GTline to 20” rims and put on the CC2s—can’t stand the ugly stock rims and plastic covers. It got so much quieter that we noticed we could turn the radio down from 6 to 4 on the secondary roads, and down from 8 to 5 on the highway. Efficiency improved slightly, possibly due to lighter weight wheels.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 31 tests | 67 | 99 |
| Reviews found online | 52 | 88 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 90% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 99% | 100% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 52.2 = 61
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 31 tests | 77 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 92 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 98% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 90% | 92% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 92% | 94% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 60.4 = 70
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 27 tests | 71 | 99 |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 79 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 95% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 97% | 99% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 88% | 100% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 71 + 40% × 60.5 = 67
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.7 = 91
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 67 |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 86 |
Solus 4S HA32: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 56 = 60
CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.1 + 60% × 86.1 = 79
No road tests of comfort for Solus 4S HA32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 20 tests | 74 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 83 |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 99% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.5 = 79
No owner ratings of noise for Solus 4S HA32. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 7 tests | 70 | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 57 | 88 |
| Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 74% |
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 65
CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 52 | 82 |
| Source | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 23 tests | 54 | 90 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 87% | 99% |
| Category | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 | Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 87 |
| Dry | 61 | 95 |
| Wet | 70 | 87 |
| Snow | 67 | 91 |
| Comfort | 60 | 79 |
| Noise | 71 | 79 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 84 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 82 |
| Efficiency | 54 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Solus 4S HA32
CrossClimate 2
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Kumho Solus 4S HA32 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin CrossClimate 2 4 times.
| Discipline | Category | Solus 4S HA32 | CrossClimate 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% | 100% | −9.6 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 100% | −1.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 95% | 98% | −3.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% | 92% | −2.1 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 92% | 94% | −1.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 95% | 95% | −0.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% | 99% | −1.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 88% | 100% | −12.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 99% | +0.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 100% | 74% | +25.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% | 99% | −12.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 96% | 61% | +35.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #2/16 | #10/16 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Value | Cost | 100% | 47% | +53.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/35 | #3/35 | – | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 as an affordable, budget-friendly all-weather tire that delivers quiet operation and predictable, surprisingly good winter handling. However, opinions are divided due to frequent reports of fast tread wear and shorter lifespan compared to tier-one alternatives. While some users find them to be great value for mild winter and year-round commuting, others recommend higher-tier brands if longevity is a primary concern.
“We're now 18 months later, and my Kumho Solus 4S HA32 235/45 R18 W (98) are ready to be replaced (a bit more life in the fronts, but the rears certainly - this is a RWD only Model 3 SR+ on 18" rims). The car is now at 48.5k miles, so it looks like I got about 24k miles out of them in that year-and-half. Sadly those exact Kumho tyres don't seem to be available anymore, and the alternative which comes up is Kumho Solus 4S HA32 235/45 R18 Y (98) which has a worse fuel efficiency (only C, rather than B rated). So while they are competitively priced (little changed), I'm looking at other brands.”
“Best Affordable Tires Hello! I need to get all four tires replaced on my 2019 Hyundai ELANTRA SEL and I’m looking for an affordable All Weather tire recommendations. Car might see three big days of snow (based in Kansas but probably going to be out of state when that weather is occurring). Other than that, just mild flurry’s, nothing that really sticks. It’s really hard with the budget we have which is around $600 for all 4. Not sure if we’re gonna find any good ones within that range but thought I’d ask people who know what they’re talking about before I just go with the cheapest tire I can find and pray I don’t spin out lol. TYIA! Edit/Update: Thank you to everyone who replied! I ended up going with Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32 tires. I know they’re not the greatest but since I will most likely be out of Kansas when they have their heavy snow winter weather we just needed some good tires for basically just dry road and rain👏 They were cheaper at Walmart and used the American Tires price match to get them for cheaper! Would’ve gotten them installed through Walmart to save but just in case something happens in Kansas the Discount Tires is more accessible and with tire coverage will be a cheaper repairs. Thank you again! Read more”
“Get the CC2 if they aren't fucked up. That said, my CX-9 came with the Kumho HA32 and they were surprisingly good in the winter. Their tread is shit now after about 60k so I'll be replacing them with new CC2s, but overall I can't complain about the tire.”
Based on 29 community posts
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”
“I live in Vancouver,WA and the CC2 are great for our climate even the light snowfall. I have an SR+, so they’re the 18” version. I have about 22K miles on them after 2 years and have averaged 240Wh/mi since installation, and I don’t drive conservatively. They did increase power usage by about 15-20Wh/mi. I’ve also been lazy and haven’t rotated them and they still are wearing very well. Got about 8/32nd up front and 6/32 in rear. Much better than the stock tires that were almost worn out at 22K. Note that places like Costco will not install these on your Tesla because they don’t meet the factory speed rating. It’s a CYA thing.”
“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”
Based on 762 community posts
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus 4S HA32 | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 106 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 20″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 59 | 59 |
Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better efficiency, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 54 on efficiency.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 61 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 52 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 67 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 70 on our wet score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 61 on our dry score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 67 on our snow score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 71 on our noise score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 54 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
