Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 vs Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 2 road tests and 4,307 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Solus 4S HA32 and Atrezzo 4 Seasons are level at 65.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Tire AKumho

Solus 4S HA32

All Season

± 6

Tests 71 · 5 tests Owners 57 · 4,307 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wear)

“They have been great so far. Unfortunately, only minor snow storms since they were installed but so far so good . Very quiet and predictable handling.”

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons
Tire BSailun

Atrezzo 4 Seasons

All Season

± 7

Tests 67 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 10 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 Seasons
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests6768
    Reviews found online5260
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%91%

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 59.8 = 65

  2. 70

    Wet

    Solus 4S HA32 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 Seasons
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests7772
    Reviews found online6063
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–091%85%

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 60.4 = 70

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 72 + 40% × 63 = 68

  3. 67

    Snow

    Solus 4S HA32 +11
    56
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 Seasons
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7152
    Reviews found online6162

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 71 + 40% × 60.7 = 67

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 51.8 + 40% × 62 = 56

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 Seasons
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5665

    Solus 4S HA32: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 56 = 60

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Solus 4S HA32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Atrezzo 4 Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 Seasons
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7477
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 Seasons
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests70≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5768

    Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 65

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Atrezzo 4 Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 52

    Handling (owners)

    Atrezzo 4 Seasons +10
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 Seasons
    Reviews found online5262
  8. 54

    Efficiency

    Solus 4S HA32 +10
    44
    Why this score
    SourceSolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 Seasons
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests5444
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 vs Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus 4S HA32Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons
Relative Score 65 65
Dry 61 65
Wet 70 68
Snow 67 56
Comfort 60 66
Noise 71 73
Treadwear 65 68
Handling (owners) 52 62
Efficiency 54 44

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Solus 4S HA32

± 7

Atrezzo 4 Seasons

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Kumho Solus 4S HA32 finished ahead 1 times and Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons 0 times.

DisciplineCategorySolus 4S HA32Atrezzo 4 SeasonsΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% 91% −1.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 91% 85% +5.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #10/31 #20/31 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus 4S HA32

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium alternatives
  • Good grip and confidence-inspiring performance in wet and winter conditions
  • Comfortable ride quality that effectively absorbs road imperfections and potholes

Cons

  • Some users reported faster-than-expected tread wear or peeling
  • Road noise can increase or become prominent in hot weather or as the tires age
  • Dry cornering and high-temperature performance lack the sharpness of dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the Solus 4S HA32 review

Tire B Atrezzo 4 Seasons

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money and affordable purchase price
  • Low noise levels and quiet, comfortable ride quality
  • Good grip and stopping distances on dry and wet surfaces

Cons

  • Tendency to slide or feel unstable under heavy braking as the tires age
  • Noticeable drop in wet grip and cornering stability after 3-4 years of use
  • Confusing rolling resistance labeling on certain variants
All owner themes in the Atrezzo 4 Seasons review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Solus 4S HA32

Mixed

Community opinion is split. Some owners praise the tire as quiet, predictable, good in winter, and a cheaper alternative to the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Others report fast or uneven wear, with lifespans of about 24k to 60k miles and some premature wear cases, and say the tire is lower-tier compared with premium all-weather options. Most posts are shoppers asking for opinions, and the tire is often chosen for its low price and 3PMSF rating.

Top themes
#Fast tread wear#Budget all-weather option#Winter snow performance#Quiet predictable handling#CrossClimate 2 comparison#3PMSF rating#Uneven edge wear#Limited long-term data

Based on 30 community posts

Tire B

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus 4S HA32 B · Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10631
Rim diameters13″ – 20″13″ – 17″
Sizes in common2929

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus 4S HA32

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons

Too close to call: Kumho Solus 4S HA32 and Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus 4S HA32 is stronger on snow and efficiency. Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons is stronger on handling, comfort and dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 scores 67 vs 56 on snow.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Kumho Solus 4S HA32 scores 54 vs 44 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons scores 62 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons scores 66 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Tire B · Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Which is better in the wet, Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons, 65 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Kumho Solus 4S HA32, 67 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons, 66 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Solus 4S HA32 or Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Kumho Solus 4S HA32, 54 vs 44 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology