tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus HA31 vs Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 18 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

Solus HA31 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus HA31
Tire AKumho

Solus HA31

All Season

± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests64≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7879

    Solus HA31: 60% × 63.7 + 40% × 78 = 69

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 79

    Wet

    Solus HA31 +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests76≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online8479

    Solus HA31: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 83.6 = 79

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 75.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 72

    Snow

    Solus HA31 +22
    50
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests66≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online8037

    Solus HA31: 60% × 65.8 + 40% × 80.4 = 72

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 36.9 = 50

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    Solus HA31 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7674

    Solus HA31: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 75.7 = 74

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.2 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    Solus HA31 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7373

    Solus HA31: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 73 = 73

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Solus HA31 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7265

    Solus HA31: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 71.7 = 72

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Solus HA31 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31Geolandar X-CV G057
    Reviews found online7877
  8. 63

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31Geolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63–
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Solus HA31Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Relative Score 74 70
Dry 69 75
Wet 79 77
Snow 72 50
Comfort 74 73
Noise 73 69
Treadwear 72 65
Handling (owners) 78 77
Efficiency 63 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus HA31

± 8

Geolandar X-CV G057

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus HA31

Pros

  • Excellent snow and winter weather traction
  • Strong grip and stability on wet and dry roads
  • High value and competitive pricing compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Tires can feel slightly soft in warmer weather conditions
  • Mixed feedback regarding dry performance compared to dedicated summer options
All owner themes in the Solus HA31 review

Tire B Geolandar X-CV G057

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and road confidence in rainy conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Crisp handling and responsive steering performance

Cons

  • Some users report faster-than-expected tread wear
  • Firm ride quality noted on certain crossover fitments
All owner themes in the Geolandar X-CV G057 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus HA31 B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available2964
Rim diameters13″ – 18″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG420 A A520 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus HA31

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

Narrow edge: Kumho Solus HA31 — better snow, treadwear and noise. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 if dry matters most to you. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 72 vs 50 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 72 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 75 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 73 vs 69 on noise.

Tire A · Kumho Solus HA31
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Which is better in the wet, Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 77 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Kumho Solus HA31, 72 vs 50 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Kumho Solus HA31, 73 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Solus HA31 or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Kumho Solus HA31, 72 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology