Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus KH17 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 56 + 165 owner reviews. How we score

N Fera SU1 leads, 63–59 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus KH17
Tire AKumho

Solus KH17

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 56 reviews

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 165 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Level
    58
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 62 (est.)55
    Reviews found online5364

    Solus KH17: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 63.7 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    N Fera SU1 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 65 (est.)62
    Reviews found online6067

    Solus KH17: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 63

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.2 + 40% × 67.1 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online–49

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    N Fera SU1 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)66
    Reviews found online5465

    Solus KH17: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 54.4 = 59

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Solus KH17. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–69
    Reviews found online–70

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.5 = 69

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5159

    Solus KH17: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.4 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera SU1 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17N Fera SU1
    Reviews found online5666
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KH17N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–76
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus KH17 vs Nexen N Fera SU1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus KH17Nexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 59 63
Dry 58 58
Wet 63 64
Snow – 58
Comfort 59 65
Noise – 69
Treadwear 57 66
Handling (owners) 56 66
Efficiency – 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Solus KH17

± 8

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategorySolus KH17N Fera SU1ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #14/54 2013 54 Tyre Braking Test #5/6 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus KH17

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong dry weather traction and road feedback
  • Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
  • Mixed performance in wet conditions
  • Susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural issues
All owner themes in the Solus KH17 review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus KH17 B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1197
Rim diameters13″ – 18″15″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common55

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus KH17

Nexen N Fera SU1

Narrow edge: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 65 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Solus KH17
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus KH17 or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, Solus KH17 or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KH17 or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 58 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus KH17 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus KH17 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology