Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus KL21 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 14 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 64–53

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus KL21
Tire AKumho

Solus KL21

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 14 reviews

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 9

Tests 55 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 52

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +13
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KL21Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 58 (est.)58
    Reviews found online4476

    Solus KL21: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 52

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.2 + 40% × 75.8 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Solus KL21. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 56

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +11
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KL21Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 60 (est.)60
    Reviews found online5178

    Solus KL21: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 56

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 78 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Solus KL21. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 52

    Snow

    Solus KL21 +3
    49
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KL21Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)36
    Reviews found online3970

    Solus KL21: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 39.1 = 52

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 35.7 + 40% × 69.5 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Solus KL21. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 51

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +19
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KL21Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4370

    Solus KL21: 40% × 63.5 (est.) + 60% × 43 = 51

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Solus KL21. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KL21Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–79

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Crugen HT51 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KL21Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)58
    Reviews found online5076

    Solus KL21: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus KL21. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 44

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +30
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSolus KL21Crugen HT51
    Reviews found online4474
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus KL21 vs Kumho Crugen HT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus KL21Kumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 53 64
Dry 52 65
Wet 56 67
Snow 52 49
Comfort 51 70
Noise – 72
Treadwear 56 66
Handling (owners) 44 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Solus KL21

± 9

Crugen HT51

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus KL21

Pros

  • Impressive treadwear and longevity reported by many users, with several achieving over 30,000 to 40,000 miles
  • Good ride comfort and low road noise under normal driving conditions
  • Affordable replacement pricing compared to premium tier brands

Cons

  • Extremely poor grip and significantly increased braking distances on fresh or compact snow and ice
  • Isolated reports of extreme premature wear or complete tread failure under 20,000 miles
  • Structural deformation issues reported by at least one user
All owner themes in the Solus KL21 review

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus KL21 B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available544
Rim diameters17″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth—12.5/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus KL21

Kumho Crugen HT51

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, comfort and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus KL21 if snow matters most to you. Kumho Solus KL21 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 44 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 65 vs 52 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 67 vs 56 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Solus KL21
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus KL21 or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, Solus KL21 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 67 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KL21 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 65 vs 52 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus KL21 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Solus KL21, 52 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Solus KL21 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus KL21 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 66 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology