Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 5 reviews
Kumho Solus KU50 vs Nexen N Priz 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Solus KU50 is ahead, 71–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Solus KU50 +1259Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Priz 4S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 73 53 Solus KU50: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
N Priz 4S: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 59
No road tests of dry for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N Priz 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Solus KU50 +1857Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Priz 4S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 76 51 Solus KU50: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
N Priz 4S: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
No road tests of wet for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N Priz 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Solus KU50 +561Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Priz 4S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 64 54 Solus KU50: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 66
N Priz 4S: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 61
No road tests of snow for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for N Priz 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Solus KU50 +860Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Priz 4S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 55 Solus KU50: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68
N Priz 4S: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 55.2 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Solus KU50 or N Priz 4S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Solus KU50 +1255Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Priz 4S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 68 49 Solus KU50: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
N Priz 4S: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Solus KU50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N Priz 4S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Solus KU50 +2651Why this score
Source Solus KU50 N Priz 4S Reviews found online 77 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KU50 | Nexen N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 58 |
| Dry | 71 | 59 |
| Wet | 75 | 57 |
| Snow | 66 | 61 |
| Comfort | 68 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Solus KU50
N Priz 4S
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus KU50
Pros
- Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
- Reliable traction and safety in wet weather
- High level of user satisfaction and brand loyalty
Cons
- Limited long-term tread life data available from current user feedback
- Lack of diverse vehicle-specific performance reports
Tire B N Priz 4S
Pros
- Good dry grip and handling performance
- Commendable traction and control in snow and cold temperatures
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality with low noise
Cons
- Significantly compromised wet-weather grip leading to understeer and difficult braking
- Rapid or poor tread wear reported by multiple users
- Inconsistent performance on ice and slush
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KU50 | B · Nexen N Priz 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 29 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 13″ – 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Solus KU50
Nexen N Priz 4S
Winner: Kumho Solus KU50 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Solus KU50 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N Priz 4S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 77 vs 51 on handling.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 75 vs 57 on wet.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 71 vs 59 on dry.
Kumho Solus KU50 scores 67 vs 55 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Solus KU50 or N Priz 4S?
Which is better in the wet, Solus KU50 or N Priz 4S?
Kumho Solus KU50, 75 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KU50 or N Priz 4S?
Kumho Solus KU50, 71 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Solus KU50 or N Priz 4S?
Kumho Solus KU50, 66 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Solus KU50 or N Priz 4S?
Kumho Solus KU50, 68 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Solus KU50 or N Priz 4S?
Kumho Solus KU50, 67 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology