Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA11 vs Yokohama AVID Ascend LX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 59 + 34 owner reviews. How we score

AVID Ascend LX is ahead, 72–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA11
Tire AKumho

Solus TA11

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 59 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    AVID Ascend LX +9
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6478

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    AVID Ascend LX +4
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7075

    Solus TA11: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    AVID Ascend LX +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5361

    Solus TA11: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    AVID Ascend LX +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6574

    Solus TA11: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.3 = 67

    AVID Ascend LX: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 73.9 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA11 or AVID Ascend LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)63
    Reviews found online7076

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 62.8 + 40% × 76.4 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    AVID Ascend LX +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus TA11 vs Yokohama AVID Ascend LX: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus TA11Yokohama AVID Ascend LX
Relative Score 67 72
Dry 66 75
Wet 70 74
Snow 60 65
Comfort 67 72
Noise 68 68
Treadwear 67 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus TA11

± 8

AVID Ascend LX

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus TA11

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Reliable traction in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Lack of rigidity or grip for aggressive driving
  • Subpar performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise depending on the vehicle or surface
All owner themes in the Solus TA11 review

Tire B AVID Ascend LX

Pros

  • Exceptional treadlife with reports of high mileage remaining even after tens of thousands of miles
  • Smooth and exceptionally comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise at highway speeds

Cons

  • A few users experienced poor wet weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning
  • Isolated reports of rapid, uneven front tire wear
  • Slightly higher road noise noted by a minority of drivers compared to previous sets
All owner themes in the AVID Ascend LX review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA11 B · Yokohama AVID Ascend LX
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1839
Rim diameters13″ – 18″15″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG700 A B800 A A
Treadwear warranty75,000 mi85,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA11

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX

Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend LX — better dry, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 75 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 65 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 74 vs 70 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA11
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend LX

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus TA11 or AVID Ascend LX?

Which is better in the wet, Solus TA11 or AVID Ascend LX?

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA11 or AVID Ascend LX?

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus TA11 or AVID Ascend LX?

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus TA11 or AVID Ascend LX?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus TA11 or AVID Ascend LX?

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus TA11 or AVID Ascend LX?

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology