Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews
Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho Solus TA11 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 164 + 59 owner reviews. How we score
Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 59 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Crugen HT51 +866Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Solus TA11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 77 64 Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74
Solus TA11: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
76
Wet
Crugen HT51 +670Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Solus TA11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 79 70 Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 76
Solus TA11: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70
No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
Crugen HT51 +1060Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Solus TA11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 70 53 Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
Solus TA11: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60
No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
70
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +367Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Solus TA11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 71 65 Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
Solus TA11: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.3 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Noise
Crugen HT51 +468Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Solus TA11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 80 70 Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 72
Solus TA11: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Solus TA11 +267Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Solus TA11 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 58 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 76 68 Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.4 = 65
Solus TA11: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
74
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Solus TA11 Reviews found online 74 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HT51 | Kumho Solus TA11 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 67 |
| Dry | 74 | 66 |
| Wet | 76 | 70 |
| Snow | 70 | 60 |
| Comfort | 70 | 67 |
| Noise | 72 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Crugen HT51
Solus TA11
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
Tire B Solus TA11
Pros
- Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Reliable traction in dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Lack of rigidity or grip for aggressive driving
- Subpar performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
- Occasional reports of road noise depending on the vehicle or surface
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HT51 | B · Kumho Solus TA11 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 44 | 18 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 12.5/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 720 A A | 700 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Crugen HT51
Kumho Solus TA11
Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better snow, dry and wet. Where the Kumho Solus TA11 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 60 on snow.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 70 on wet.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 72 vs 68 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Solus TA11?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology