Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA31 vs Nexen CP672 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 83 owner reviews. How we score

CP672 is ahead, 66–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire AKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 79 reviews

Nexen CP672
Tire BNexen

CP672

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 83 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    CP672 +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5465

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 59

    CP672: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 62

    Wet

    CP672 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5964

    Solus TA31: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    CP672: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 56

    Snow

    CP672 +11
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4765

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56

    CP672: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 67

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    CP672 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5862

    Solus TA31: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61

    CP672: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    CP672 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6171

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    CP672: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA31 or CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 59

    Treadwear

    CP672 +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5466

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    CP672 +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31CP672
    Reviews found online5462
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus TA31 vs Nexen CP672: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus TA31Nexen CP672
Relative Score 59 66
Dry 59 66
Wet 62 66
Snow 56 67
Comfort 61 64
Noise 64 68
Treadwear 59 66
Handling (owners) 54 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus TA31

± 7

CP672

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Tire B CP672

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
  • Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability

Cons

  • Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
  • Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
  • Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
All owner themes in the CP672 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA31 B · Nexen CP672
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2241
Rim diameters15″ – 20″14″ – 18″
Tread depth9.5/32″9/32″
UTQG500 A A460 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common1212

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA31

Nexen CP672

Winner: Nexen CP672 — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nexen CP672 scores 67 vs 56 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen CP672 scores 62 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen CP672 scores 66 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen CP672 scores 66 vs 59 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA31
Tire B · Nexen CP672

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus TA31 or CP672?

Which is better in the wet, Solus TA31 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 66 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA31 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus TA31 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 67 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus TA31 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Solus TA31 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 64 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Solus TA31 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 66 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology