Head-to-head Updated

Nexen CP672 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ANexen

CP672

All Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 83 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCP672BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6670
  2. 68

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCP672BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6773
  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCP672BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online67–
  4. 67

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCP672BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6574
  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCP672BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online71–
  6. 66

    Treadwear

    CP672 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCP672BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6765
  7. 65

    Handling

    BluEarth Es ES32 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCP672BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6573
Scores at a glance
Nexen CP672 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen CP672Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 66 70
Dry 66 69
Wet 68 72
Snow 68 –
Comfort 67 72
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 66 65
Handling 65 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

CP672

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CP672

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
  • Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability

Cons

  • Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
  • Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
  • Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
All owner themes in the CP672 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen CP672 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4164
Rim diameters14″ – 18″13″ – 18″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG460 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen CP672

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Nexen CP672
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Narrow edge

BluEarth Es ES32

Amazon