tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA11 vs Nexen CP672 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 59 + 83 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Solus TA11 and CP672 are level at 66.

Check price on Amazon · Solus TA11 Check price on Amazon · CP672
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA11
Tire AKumho

Solus TA11

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 59 reviews

Nexen CP672
Tire BNexen

CP672

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 83 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    CP672 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6365

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65

    CP672: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Solus TA11 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7064

    Solus TA11: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 70

    CP672: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    CP672 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5265

    Solus TA11: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 60

    CP672: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 67

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Solus TA11 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6462

    Solus TA11: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.3 = 66

    CP672: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6971

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 68

    CP672: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA11 or CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Solus TA11 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6866

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11CP672
    Reviews found online–62
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Solus TA11Nexen CP672
Relative Score 66 66
Dry 65 66
Wet 70 66
Snow 60 67
Comfort 66 64
Noise 68 68
Treadwear 67 66
Handling (owners) – 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus TA11

± 7

CP672

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus TA11

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Reliable traction in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Lack of rigidity or grip for aggressive driving
  • Subpar performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise depending on the vehicle or surface
All owner themes in the Solus TA11 review

Tire B CP672

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
  • Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability

Cons

  • Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
  • Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
  • Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
All owner themes in the CP672 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA11 B · Nexen CP672
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1841
Rim diameters13″ – 18″14″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG700 A B460 A A
Treadwear warranty75,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA11

Nexen CP672

Too close to call: Kumho Solus TA11 and Nexen CP672 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus TA11 is stronger on wet. Nexen CP672 is stronger on snow.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nexen CP672 scores 67 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus TA11 scores 70 vs 66 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA11
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen CP672
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus TA11 or CP672?

Which is better in the wet, Solus TA11 or CP672?

Kumho Solus TA11, 70 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA11 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Solus TA11 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 67 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus TA11 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus TA11 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Solus TA11 or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology