Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 21 reviews
Kumho V70a vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 21 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
V70a is ahead, 72–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
V70a +871Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 86 73 V70a: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 85.7 = 79
Advan A050: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 71
No road tests of dry for V70a. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
V70a +1460Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 75 55 V70a: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74
Advan A050: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
No road tests of wet for V70a. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Comfort
V70a +561Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 57 V70a: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66
Advan A050: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 57.1 = 61
No road tests of comfort for V70a. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
54
Treadwear
V70a +747Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 47 35 V70a: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 54
Advan A050: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 47
No road tests of treadwear for V70a. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
78
Handling (owners)
V70a +771Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Reviews found online 78 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho V70a | Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 62 |
| Dry | 79 | 71 |
| Wet | 74 | 60 |
| Comfort | 66 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 47 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
V70a
Advan A050
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A V70a
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track performance
- Rapid warm-up time compared to competitors
- Strong stability and stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- Rapid tread wear rate
- Difficult to mount due to stiff sidewalls
- Limited longevity for daily driving
Tire B Advan A050
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
- Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
Cons
- Very high price point compared to competitors
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
- Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho V70a | B · Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho V70a
Yokohama Advan A050
Winner: Kumho V70a — better wet, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho V70a scores 74 vs 60 on wet.
Kumho V70a scores 79 vs 71 on dry.
Kumho V70a scores 54 vs 47 on treadwear.
Kumho V70a scores 78 vs 71 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
V70a or Advan A050?
Which is better in the wet, V70a or Advan A050?
Kumho V70a, 74 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, V70a or Advan A050?
Kumho V70a, 79 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, V70a or Advan A050?
Kumho V70a, 66 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, V70a or Advan A050?
Kumho V70a, 54 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology