Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 21 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho V70a vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
V70a is ahead, 70–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
V70a +573Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Reviews found online 84 75 -
72
Wet
V70a +1656Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Reviews found online 73 52 -
67
Comfort
V70a +364Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Reviews found online 64 59 -
56
Treadwear
V70a +947Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Reviews found online 50 34 -
76
Handling
V70a +373Why this score
Source V70a Advan A050 Reviews found online 76 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho V70a | Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 61 |
| Dry | 78 | 73 |
| Wet | 72 | 56 |
| Comfort | 67 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 47 |
| Handling | 76 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
V70a
61
/ 100
Advan A050
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A V70a
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track performance
- Rapid warm-up time compared to competitors
- Strong stability and stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- Rapid tread wear rate
- Difficult to mount due to stiff sidewalls
- Limited longevity for daily driving
Tire B Advan A050
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
- Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
Cons
- Very high price point compared to competitors
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
- Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho V70a | B · Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Kumho V70a
61
/ 100
Yokohama Advan A050
Winner: Kumho V70a — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho V70a scores 72 vs 56 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho V70a scores 56 vs 47 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho V70a scores 78 vs 73 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho V70a scores 67 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho V70a
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.