Tests 65 · 3 tests Owners 69 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test (noise)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 6 road tests and 15 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Winter Craft WP51 and Ice Zero 2 are level at 67.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 65 · 3 tests Owners 69 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test (noise)
Tests 78 · 6 tests Owners 57 · 3 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests | 61 | 82 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 57 |
Winter Craft WP51: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 64.1 = 62
Ice Zero 2: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 56.8 = 72
| Source | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests | 66 | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 61 |
Winter Craft WP51: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 69.9 = 68
Ice Zero 2: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 60.9 = 73
| Source | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests | 67 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 63 |
Winter Craft WP51: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 70
Ice Zero 2: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 62.8 = 70
| Source | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 49 |
Winter Craft WP51: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 70.1 = 70
Ice Zero 2: 40% × 72 + 60% × 49.2 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Winter Craft WP51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests | 71 | 65 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Winter Craft WP51: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
Ice Zero 2: 60% × 64.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of noise for Winter Craft WP51 or Ice Zero 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 49 |
Winter Craft WP51: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67
Ice Zero 2: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Winter Craft WP51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ice Zero 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | 53 |
| Source | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests | 55 | 70 |
| Category | Kumho Winter Craft WP51 | Pirelli Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 67 |
| Dry | 62 | 72 |
| Wet | 68 | 73 |
| Snow | 70 | 70 |
| Comfort | 70 | 58 |
| Noise | 69 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 53 |
| Efficiency | 55 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Winter Craft WP51
Ice Zero 2
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Winter Craft WP51 | Ice Zero 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #11/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 97% #9/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 91% #7/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 84% #14/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 85% #32/49 · 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | 100% #8/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 90% #11/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 89% #4/8 · 2017 AC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | 78% #13/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Ice Handling | Snow | 85% #8/8 · 2017 AC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | 92% #7/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Ice Traction | Snow | 92% #3/8 · 2017 AC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | 68% #4/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 92% #29/35 · 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | 99% #9/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% #5/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 97% #5/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 89% #8/8 · 2017 AC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | 99% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 98% #4/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 92% #2/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 55% #10/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #16/16 2021 ADAC Winter Tire Test R15 | #4/6 2027 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Kumho Winter Craft WP51 | B · Pirelli Ice Zero 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 15″ | — |
Kumho Winter Craft WP51
Pirelli Ice Zero 2
Too close to call: Kumho Winter Craft WP51 and Pirelli Ice Zero 2 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Winter Craft WP51 is stronger on handling, comfort and treadwear. Pirelli Ice Zero 2 is stronger on efficiency, dry and wet.
Pirelli Ice Zero 2 scores 70 vs 55 on efficiency.
Kumho Winter Craft WP51 scores 66 vs 53 on handling.
Kumho Winter Craft WP51 scores 70 vs 58 on comfort.
Kumho Winter Craft WP51 scores 67 vs 56 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pirelli Ice Zero 2, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.
Pirelli Ice Zero 2, 72 vs 62 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Kumho Winter Craft WP51, 69 vs 65 on our noise score.
Kumho Winter Craft WP51, 70 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Kumho Winter Craft WP51, 67 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Pirelli Ice Zero 2, 70 vs 55 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology