Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 81 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 13 road tests and 9 + 2,509 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: G Fit 4S and Ventus Prime 4 are level at 75.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,509 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +880Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 11 tests 65 84 Reviews found online 81 73 G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.3 = 72
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 73 = 80
-
85
Wet
G Fit 4S +778Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 12 tests 86 80 Reviews found online 85 74 G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 74.4 = 78
-
77
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 77 – Reviews found online 77 – G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 76.8 = 77
-
76
Comfort
G Fit 4S +769Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 72 70 Reviews found online 79 68 G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 78.5 = 76
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.7 = 69
-
38
Noise
Ventus Prime 4 +2361Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 8 tests 19 58 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.5 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 38
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
75
Treadwear
G Fit 4S +174Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests 72 78 Reviews found online 79 67 G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.6 = 75
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 67.1 = 74
-
80
Handling (owners)
G Fit 4S +872Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 80 72 -
47
Efficiency
Ventus Prime 4 +3683Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 8 tests 47 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G Fit 4S | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 75 |
| Dry | 72 | 80 |
| Wet | 85 | 78 |
| Snow | 77 | – |
| Comfort | 76 | 69 |
| Noise | 38 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 47 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
G Fit 4S
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | G Fit 4S | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #9/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 92% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #2/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 99% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 87% #5/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 93% #6/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #2/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 91% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% #3/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 87% #14/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% #3/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #3/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 99% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 92% #7/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 93% #12/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 99% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 79% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 72% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 80% #6/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 77% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 84% #11/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 95% #10/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #10/15 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | #4/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 92% #3/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 64% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/12 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G Fit 4S
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
- High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
- Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Laufenn G Fit 4S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
·2024-11-12
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
r/tires
·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G Fit 4S | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 79 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 48 | 48 |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Laufenn G Fit 4S
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Too close to call: Laufenn G Fit 4S and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 are within 2 points overall. Laufenn G Fit 4S is stronger on handling, wet and comfort. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is stronger on efficiency, noise and dry.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 83 vs 47 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 61 vs 38 on noise.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 80 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 72 on dry.
Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G Fit 4S or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, G Fit 4S or Ventus Prime 4?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 78 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G Fit 4S or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, G Fit 4S or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 61 vs 38 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, G Fit 4S or Ventus Prime 4?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 76 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, G Fit 4S or Ventus Prime 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Which rolls more easily, G Fit 4S or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 83 vs 47 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology