Tests 69 · 5 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus Prime 4 leads, 75–74 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 74 · 2,473 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)
“Az enyémen Ventus Prime4 van, 23 májusi dottal, 23 május végén véve. Két nyár és 20.000km alatt sosem tapasztaltam hogy picit is gond lenne vele, pedig voltam bőven esőben vele. Az esp nekem akkor villogott nagyon mikor eltört a rugó, de az is inkább kanyarban, nem kigyorsításnál. Lengéscsillapítók rendben vannak?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +1280Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 60 83 Reviews found online 79 76 Dry Braking (% of best) 86% 98% Dry Handling (% of best) 100% 97% -
83
Wet
G Fit 4S +479Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 83 80 Reviews found online 84 77 Wet Braking (% of best) 91% 87% Wet Circle (% of best) 100% 98% Wet Handling (% of best) 99% 99% -
74
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 71 – Reviews found online 79 – -
74
Comfort
G Fit 4S +470Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 79 71 -
49
Noise
Ventus Prime 4 +1463Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 37 61 -
74
Treadwear
G Fit 4S +173Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 72 76 Reviews found online 77 69 -
78
Handling
G Fit 4S +474Why this score
Source G Fit 4S Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 78 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G Fit 4S | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 75 |
| Dry | 68 | 80 |
| Wet | 83 | 79 |
| Snow | 74 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 70 |
| Noise | 49 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 73 |
| Handling | 78 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
G Fit 4S
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | G Fit 4S | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 83% #11/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 82% #17/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 86% #25/32 · 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview | 98% #3/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test | −11.8 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #4/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 97% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | +2.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 81% #14/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 77% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +3.5 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 79% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 82% #4/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −3.4 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 94% #15/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 97% #7/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | −2.4 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 92% #3/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 49% #22/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +43.4 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 80% #6/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 59% #13/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +21.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 0% #9/9 · 2025 Motorlab All-Season Tire Test R16 | 9% #11/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −9.1 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 94% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 90% #10/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | +3.6 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #10/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 0% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #18/32 · 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview | 87% #14/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +3.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 100% #1/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #2/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 99% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | −0.4 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G Fit 4S
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
- High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
- Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Laufenn G Fit 4S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is generally praised as a high-performing and cost-effective touring tire, frequently compared favorably against premium brands like Michelin. Users appreciate its solid dry and wet grip, making it a reliable upgrade over stock or budget tires, though long-term mileage projections in official tests show some conflicting estimates.
r/croautomobili
·1 upvote ·2026-09-23
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
r/TyreReviews
·4 upvotes ·2024-03-19
“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”
r/kereta
·2 upvotes ·2026-09-24
“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”
Top themes
#wet and dry grip#touring tyre category#michelin comparison#price to performance ratio#longevity and mileage#ev compatibility symbol
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G Fit 4S | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 79 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Laufenn G Fit 4S
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Too close to call: Laufenn G Fit 4S and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 are within 2 points overall. Laufenn G Fit 4S is stronger on wet, comfort and handling. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is stronger on noise and dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 63 vs 49 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 83 vs 79 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 74 vs 70 on comfort.
Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.