Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Laufenn I FIT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 1 road tests and 9 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
G Fit 4S is ahead, 78–50
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
G Fit 4S +2250Why this score
Source G Fit 4S I FIT Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests 65 ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 81 40 G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 72
I FIT: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.9 = 50
No road tests of dry for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
85
Wet
G Fit 4S +4243Why this score
Source G Fit 4S I FIT Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests 86 50 Reviews found online 85 34 G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85
I FIT: 60% × 49.8 + 40% × 33.7 = 43
-
77
Snow
G Fit 4S +1463Why this score
Source G Fit 4S I FIT Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 77 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 77 58 G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 77 = 77
I FIT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 63
No road tests of snow for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
75
Comfort
G Fit 4S +2055Why this score
Source G Fit 4S I FIT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 72 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 78 48 G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 78.1 = 75
I FIT: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of comfort for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
38
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source G Fit 4S I FIT Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 18 – Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) – G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 38
No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
75
Treadwear
G Fit 4S +2154Why this score
Source G Fit 4S I FIT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 72 ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 79 46 G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.5 = 75
I FIT: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.8 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
80
Handling (owners)
G Fit 4S +4337Why this score
Source G Fit 4S I FIT Reviews found online 80 37 -
47
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source G Fit 4S I FIT Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 47 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G Fit 4S | Laufenn I FIT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 50 |
| Dry | 72 | 50 |
| Wet | 85 | 43 |
| Snow | 77 | 63 |
| Comfort | 75 | 55 |
| Noise | 38 | – |
| Treadwear | 75 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 37 |
| Efficiency | 47 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
G Fit 4S
50
/ 100
I FIT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | G Fit 4S | I FIT | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% #3/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | 74% #44/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/12 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | #47/45 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G Fit 4S
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
- High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
- Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
Tire B I FIT
Pros
- Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
- Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand
Cons
- Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
- Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
- Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G Fit 4S | B · Laufenn I FIT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 79 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 20″ | 14″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | 640 B A | — |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Laufenn G Fit 4S
50
/ 100
Laufenn I FIT
Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn I FIT rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 80 vs 37 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 85 vs 43 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 72 vs 50 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 75 vs 54 on treadwear.
Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Laufenn I FIT
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G Fit 4S or I FIT?
Which is better in the wet, G Fit 4S or I FIT?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 43 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G Fit 4S or I FIT?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 72 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, G Fit 4S or I FIT?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 77 vs 63 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, G Fit 4S or I FIT?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, G Fit 4S or I FIT?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology