tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 32 road tests and 9 + 21,629 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–75

Check price on Amazon · CrossClimate 2 or G Fit 4S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire ALaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

± 6

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 81 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 32 tests Owners 86 · 21,629 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, G Fit 4S won 0 and CrossClimate 2 won 3 (average 87% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, G Fit 4S won 0 and CrossClimate 2 won 3 (average 87% vs 91% of the best).
  1. 72

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +23
    95
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 30 tests6599
    Reviews found online8188
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–387%99%

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.3 = 72

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.3 + 40% × 88.1 = 95

  2. 85

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +1
    86
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 30 tests8683
    Reviews found online8591
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–387%91%

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 91.4 = 86

  3. 77

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +13
    90
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 26 tests7799
    Reviews found online7778

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 76.8 = 77

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 77.7 = 90

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7264
    Reviews found online7986

    G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 78.5 = 76

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 64.2 + 60% × 86.3 = 77

  5. 38

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +42
    80
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 19 tests1978
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)82

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.5 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 38

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 82.3 = 80

    No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +9
    84
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests7281
    Reviews found online7987

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.6 = 75

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 87.2 = 84

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +2
    82
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2
    Reviews found online8082
  8. 47

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 +43
    90
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 22 tests4790
Scores at a glance
CategoryLaufenn G Fit 4SMichelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score 75 87
Dry 72 95
Wet 85 86
Snow 77 90
Comfort 76 77
Noise 38 80
Treadwear 75 84
Handling (owners) 80 82
Efficiency 47 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

G Fit 4S

± 4

CrossClimate 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Laufenn G Fit 4S finished ahead 0 times and Michelin CrossClimate 2 4 times.

DisciplineCategoryG Fit 4SCrossClimate 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 87% 99% −12.1 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17
Wet Braking Wet 87% 91% −4.2 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/9 #3/9 – 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 Motorlab All-Season Tire Test R16 · 205/55R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

Tire B CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Laufenn G Fit 4S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

r/ModelY ·4 upvotes ·2026-06-01

“New CrossClimate 2 tires almost stranded my family. Massive efficiency drop on Model Y. Just a heads-up for anyone swapping to Michelin CrossClimate 2s. Put a set on my Model Y about 3 weeks ago from Discount Tire and just did a road trip from Denver to Taos, NM with my wife and two toddlers. We charged up to 90% at the Pueblo Supercharger, and the Tesla app estimated we would arrive in Taos with 15% battery remaining. Well, the new tire efficiency hit is incredibly real. The range dropped so fast that we were tracking to hit 0% and had to make an emergency Type 2 charging stop on the way just to make sure we didn't get stranded with the kids in the car. I’m now seriously thinking about taking advantage of Discount Tire's return policy and going back to the OEM Continental ProContact RX. Has anyone else faced similar problems or massive efficiency drops when switching to the CC2s? Does the range eventually get better after a break-in period, or should I just cut my losses and swap back to the Continentals? I need something reliable for road trips with the family, so I'd love to hear your suggestions and experiences!”
macheforum.com ·8 upvotes ·2021-06-28

“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”
r/volt ·8 upvotes ·2026-09-18

“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn G Fit 4S B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7992
Rim diameters13″ – 20″15″ – 21″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—640 B A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common5353

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better efficiency, noise and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 47 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 38 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 72 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 77 on snow.

Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G Fit 4S or CrossClimate 2?

Which is better in the wet, G Fit 4S or CrossClimate 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 85 vs 86 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, G Fit 4S or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, G Fit 4S or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 77 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, G Fit 4S or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 80 vs 38 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, G Fit 4S or CrossClimate 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, G Fit 4S or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 75 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, G Fit 4S or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 47 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology