Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 5 + 0 road tests and 9 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

G Fit 4S is ahead, 75–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire ALaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

Tests 69 · 5 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    G Fit 4S +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests60≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7958

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 60.3 + 40% × 79.3 = 68

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 83

    Wet

    G Fit 4S +26
    57
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests83≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online8453

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 83.6 = 83

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 74

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71–
    Reviews found online79–

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 71 + 40% × 78.7 = 74

  4. 74

    Comfort

    G Fit 4S +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7962

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 74

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for G Fit 4S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 49

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests37–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 36.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 49

    No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    G Fit 4S +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7764

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 71.8 + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    G Fit 4S +20
    58
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online7858
Scores at a glance
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn G Fit 4SYokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 75 61
Dry 68 61
Wet 83 57
Snow 74 –
Comfort 74 65
Noise 49 –
Treadwear 74 65
Handling (owners) 78 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

G Fit 4S

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn G Fit 4S B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available79—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 83 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 78 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 74 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 74 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G Fit 4S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, G Fit 4S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 83 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, G Fit 4S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, G Fit 4S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 74 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, G Fit 4S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 74 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology