Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 15 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 15 + 1,592 owner reviews. How we score
Kinergy Eco 2 leads, 60–58 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,592 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Kinergy Eco 2 +363Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 55 50 G FIT AS: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60
Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 49.5 = 63
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
Kinergy Eco 2 +866Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 53 53 G FIT AS: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 58
Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 53.3 = 66
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) – Reviews found online 51 – G FIT AS: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 59
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
G FIT AS +853Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 58 45 G FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.8 = 61
Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.2 = 53
No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS or Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 75 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
55
Treadwear
Level55Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 48 48 G FIT AS: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55
Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
56
Handling (owners)
G FIT AS +749Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy Eco 2 Reviews found online 56 49 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison75Why this score
Source G FIT AS Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G FIT AS | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 60 |
| Dry | 60 | 63 |
| Wet | 58 | 66 |
| Snow | 59 | – |
| Comfort | 61 | 53 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 49 |
| Efficiency | – | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
G FIT AS
60
/ 100
Kinergy Eco 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Tire B Kinergy Eco 2
Pros
- Reliable dry and wet road grip
- Good value for the price point
- Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability
Cons
- Notable road noise reported by some users
- Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
- Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G FIT AS | B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 48 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 13″ – 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Laufenn G FIT AS
60
/ 100
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Narrow edge: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better wet and dry. Pick the Laufenn G FIT AS if comfort and handling matter most to you. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 61 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 66 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 56 vs 49 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 63 vs 60 on dry.
Tire A · Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G FIT AS or Kinergy Eco 2?
Which is better in the wet, G FIT AS or Kinergy Eco 2?
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 66 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G FIT AS or Kinergy Eco 2?
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 63 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, G FIT AS or Kinergy Eco 2?
Laufenn G FIT AS, 61 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, G FIT AS or Kinergy Eco 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 55 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology