Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 14 reviews
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Hankook Optimo H724 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Optimo H724 leads, 63–59 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 169 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Optimo H724 +364Why this score
Source G FIT AS Optimo H724 Reviews found online 57 62 -
59
Wet
Optimo H724 +766Why this score
Source G FIT AS Optimo H724 Reviews found online 55 64 -
59
Snow
Optimo H724 +160Why this score
Source G FIT AS Optimo H724 Reviews found online 51 53 -
64
Comfort
Optimo H724 +266Why this score
Source G FIT AS Optimo H724 Reviews found online 60 62 -
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source G FIT AS Optimo H724 Reviews found online – 66 -
55
Treadwear
Optimo H724 +863Why this score
Source G FIT AS Optimo H724 Reviews found online 48 62 -
57
Handling
Optimo H724 +461Why this score
Source G FIT AS Optimo H724 Reviews found online 57 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G FIT AS | Hankook Optimo H724 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 63 |
| Dry | 61 | 64 |
| Wet | 59 | 66 |
| Snow | 59 | 60 |
| Comfort | 64 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 63 |
| Handling | 57 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
G FIT AS
Optimo H724
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Tire B Optimo H724
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G FIT AS | B · Hankook Optimo H724 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Laufenn G FIT AS
Hankook Optimo H724
Winner: Hankook Optimo H724 — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Optimo H724 scores 63 vs 55 on treadwear.
Hankook Optimo H724 scores 66 vs 59 on wet.
Hankook Optimo H724 scores 61 vs 57 on handling.
Hankook Optimo H724 scores 64 vs 61 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.