Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn I Fit+ vs Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 7 + 0 road tests and 4 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: I Fit+ and SNOWPROX S 952 are level at 75.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn I Fit+
Tire ALaufenn

I Fit+

Winter

± 6

Tests 73 · 7 tests Owners 79 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (snow handling)

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952
Tire BToyo

SNOWPROX S 952

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+SNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests71≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7978

    I Fit+: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 78.9 = 74

    SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74

    No road tests of dry for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 79

    Wet

    Level
    79
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+SNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests76≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online8482

    I Fit+: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 84.1 = 79

    SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 79

    No road tests of wet for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 80

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+SNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests79–
    Reviews found online81–

    I Fit+: 60% × 78.9 + 40% × 80.9 = 80

  4. 75

    Comfort

    I Fit+ +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+SNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7871

    I Fit+: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75

    SNOWPROX S 952: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.2 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for I Fit+ or SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+SNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests76–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    I Fit+: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for I Fit+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    SNOWPROX S 952 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+SNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests64≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7371

    I Fit+: 60% × 64 + 40% × 73.4 = 68

    SNOWPROX S 952: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for SNOWPROX S 952. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    I Fit+ +5
    75
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+SNOWPROX S 952
    Reviews found online8075
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI Fit+SNOWPROX S 952
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests73–
Scores at a glance
Laufenn I Fit+ vs Toyo SNOWPROX S 952: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn I Fit+Toyo SNOWPROX S 952
Relative Score 75 75
Dry 74 74
Wet 79 79
Snow 80 –
Comfort 75 71
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 68 69
Handling (owners) 80 75
Efficiency 73 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

I Fit+

± 8

SNOWPROX S 952

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A I Fit+

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and performance on deep snow and ice
  • Unbeatable price-to-quality ratio and overall value
  • Reliable and safe handling on dry and wet road surfaces

Cons

  • Slightly weaker performance in heavy slush
  • Difficulty in water evacuation on roads with standing water
All owner themes in the I Fit+ review

Tire B SNOWPROX S 952

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence on snow and ice
  • Strong durability and slow tread wear
  • Excellent value for money

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, particularly at higher speeds
  • Potential for audible feedback during aggressive dry cornering
  • Inconsistent performance feedback for non-winter driving scenarios
All owner themes in the SNOWPROX S 952 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn I Fit+ B · Toyo SNOWPROX S 952
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available61—
Rim diameters13″ – 19″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn I Fit+

Toyo SNOWPROX S 952

Too close to call: Laufenn I Fit+ and Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 are within 2 points overall. Laufenn I Fit+ is stronger on comfort. Toyo SNOWPROX S 952 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn I Fit+ scores 75 vs 71 on comfort.

Tire A · Laufenn I Fit+
Tire B · Toyo SNOWPROX S 952

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

I Fit+ or SNOWPROX S 952?

Which is better in the wet, I Fit+ or SNOWPROX S 952?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 79 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, I Fit+ or SNOWPROX S 952?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, I Fit+ or SNOWPROX S 952?

Laufenn I Fit+, 75 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, I Fit+ or SNOWPROX S 952?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology