Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn I FIT vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

S fit EQ is ahead, 54–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ALaufenn

I FIT

Winter

Tests 49 · 1 test Owners 46 · 7 reviews

Best test result: #43 of 51 in 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout (overall ranking)

Tire BLaufenn

S fit EQ

Summer

Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 55 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #9 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    S fit EQ +1
    51
    Why this score
    SourceI FITS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score)–49
    Reviews found online4054
  2. 42

    Wet

    S fit EQ +8
    50
    Why this score
    SourceI FITS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score)4946
    Reviews found online3356
    Wet Braking (% of best)74%89%
  3. 64

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceI FITS fit EQ
    Reviews found online60–
  4. 62

    Comfort

    S fit EQ +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceI FITS fit EQ
    Reviews found online5556
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    56
    Why this score
    SourceI FITS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score)–49
  6. 58

    Treadwear

    S fit EQ +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceI FITS fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score)–64
    Reviews found online5359
  7. 38

    Handling

    S fit EQ +11
    49
    Why this score
    SourceI FITS fit EQ
    Reviews found online3849
Scores at a glance
Laufenn I FIT vs Laufenn S fit EQ: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn I FITLaufenn S fit EQ
Relative Score 49 54
Dry 50 51
Wet 42 50
Snow 64 –
Comfort 62 63
Noise – 56
Treadwear 58 62
Handling 38 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

I FIT

S fit EQ

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryI FITS fit EQΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 2% #43/51 · 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout 0% #12/10 · 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R17 +2.3 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 74% #44/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview 89% #9/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test −14.6 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A I FIT

Pros

  • Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
  • Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
  • Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand

Cons

  • Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
  • Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
  • Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
All owner themes in the I FIT review

Tire B S fit EQ

Pros

  • Attractive price point offering high value for money
  • Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
  • Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
  • Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
  • Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
All owner themes in the S fit EQ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn I FIT B · Laufenn S fit EQ
CategoryWinterSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available424
Rim diameters14″ – 18″15″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn I FIT

Laufenn S fit EQ

Winner: Laufenn S fit EQ — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn S fit EQ scores 49 vs 38 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn S fit EQ scores 50 vs 42 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn S fit EQ scores 62 vs 58 on treadwear.

Tire A · Laufenn I FIT
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

54

Leads

S fit EQ

Amazon