Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn I FIT vs Toyo Snowprox S943 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 7 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Snowprox S943 is ahead, 63–51

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn I FIT
Tire ALaufenn

I FIT

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests 50 · 1 test Owners 44 · 7 reviews

Toyo Snowprox S943
Tire BToyo

Snowprox S943

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    Snowprox S943 +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4058

    I FIT: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.9 = 50

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of dry for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 43

    Wet

    Snowprox S943 +24
    67
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests50≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3465

    I FIT: 60% × 49.8 + 40% × 33.7 = 43

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    I FIT +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5855

    I FIT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 63

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 62

    No road tests of snow for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Snowprox S943 +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4857

    I FIT: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55

    Snowprox S943: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.5 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Treadwear

    Snowprox S943 +11
    65
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnowprox S943
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4665

    I FIT: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.8 = 54

    Snowprox S943: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Snowprox S943. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 37

    Handling (owners)

    Snowprox S943 +19
    56
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnowprox S943
    Reviews found online3756
Scores at a glance
Laufenn I FIT vs Toyo Snowprox S943: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn I FITToyo Snowprox S943
Relative Score 51 63
Dry 50 61
Wet 43 67
Snow 63 62
Comfort 55 60
Treadwear 54 65
Handling (owners) 37 56

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

I FIT

± 8

Snowprox S943

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Laufenn I FIT finished ahead 0 times and Toyo Snowprox S943 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryI FITSnowprox S943ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #43/51 #26/51 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout · 195/65 R15

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A I FIT

Pros

  • Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
  • Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
  • Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand

Cons

  • Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
  • Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
  • Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
All owner themes in the I FIT review

Tire B Snowprox S943

Pros

  • Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Reliable handling in cold, dry, and wet road conditions
  • Good tread longevity for some driving styles

Cons

  • Poor traction and grip in snow and icy conditions
  • Increased noise levels, particularly when cornering
  • Inconsistent performance in wet conditions, specifically regarding hydroplaning
All owner themes in the Snowprox S943 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn I FIT B · Toyo Snowprox S943
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available435
Rim diameters14″ – 18″14″ – 17″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn I FIT

Toyo Snowprox S943

Winner: Toyo Snowprox S943 — better wet, handling and dry. Where the Laufenn I FIT is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Laufenn I FIT rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Snowprox S943 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Snowprox S943 scores 67 vs 43 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Snowprox S943 scores 56 vs 37 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Snowprox S943 scores 61 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Snowprox S943 scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.

Tire A · Laufenn I FIT
Tire B · Toyo Snowprox S943

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

I FIT or Snowprox S943?

Which is better in the wet, I FIT or Snowprox S943?

Toyo Snowprox S943, 67 vs 43 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, I FIT or Snowprox S943?

Toyo Snowprox S943, 61 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, I FIT or Snowprox S943?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, I FIT or Snowprox S943?

Toyo Snowprox S943, 60 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, I FIT or Snowprox S943?

Toyo Snowprox S943, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology