Tests – · 1 test Owners 58 · 16 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S FIT AS vs Continental ProContact — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
S FIT AS is ahead, 63–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
S FIT AS +1549Why this score
Source S FIT AS ProContact Reviews found online 62 39 -
62
Wet
S FIT AS +656Why this score
Source S FIT AS ProContact Reviews found online 59 51 -
52
Snow
S FIT AS +151Why this score
Source S FIT AS ProContact Reviews found online 41 38 -
66
Comfort
S FIT AS +1353Why this score
Source S FIT AS ProContact Reviews found online 63 37 -
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source S FIT AS ProContact Reviews found online 61 – -
69
Treadwear
S FIT AS +1554Why this score
Source S FIT AS ProContact Professional tests (TWG score) 74 – Reviews found online 61 45 -
61
Handling
S FIT AS +2041Why this score
Source S FIT AS ProContact Reviews found online 61 41
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S FIT AS | Continental ProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 51 |
| Dry | 64 | 49 |
| Wet | 62 | 56 |
| Snow | 52 | 51 |
| Comfort | 66 | 53 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 54 |
| Handling | 61 | 41 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
S FIT AS
51
/ 100
ProContact
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Tire B ProContact
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S FIT AS | B · Continental ProContact |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
51
/ 100
Continental ProContact
Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 61 vs 41 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 64 vs 49 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 69 vs 54 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 66 vs 53 on comfort.
Tire A · Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire B · Continental ProContact
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.