Tests – · 1 test Owners 53 · 16 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S FIT AS vs Dunlop RoadSmart II — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 16 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source S FIT AS RoadSmart II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 56 – S FIT AS: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
59
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source S FIT AS RoadSmart II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 54 – S FIT AS: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
50
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source S FIT AS RoadSmart II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) – Reviews found online 37 – S FIT AS: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 50
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
62
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source S FIT AS RoadSmart II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 59 – S FIT AS: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 58.6 = 62
No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source S FIT AS RoadSmart II Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 75 – Reviews found online 56 – S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.3 = 67
-
56
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source S FIT AS RoadSmart II Reviews found online 56 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S FIT AS | Dunlop RoadSmart II |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | – |
| Dry | 60 | – |
| Wet | 59 | – |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
59
/ 100
S FIT AS
–
/ 100
RoadSmart II
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | S FIT AS | RoadSmart II | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #15/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #5/7 2014 Motorrad Premium Touring Motorcycle Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Tire B RoadSmart II
Pros
- High levels of dry and wet grip for sport-touring applications
- Excellent steering precision and rider feedback
- Inspires confidence in varied riding conditions for satisfied users
Cons
- Reported lack of rear tire traction during aggressive cornering
- Inconsistent performance leading to safety concerns in wet weather
- Perceived inferiority compared to competing sport-touring brands
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S FIT AS | B · Dunlop RoadSmart II |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
59
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
–
/ 100
Dunlop RoadSmart II
Only Laufenn S FIT AS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire B · Dunlop RoadSmart II
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology