Tests – · 1 test Owners 58 · 16 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S FIT AS vs Kumho Solus TA71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
S FIT AS is ahead, 63–49
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 38 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
S FIT AS +1747Why this score
Source S FIT AS Solus TA71 Reviews found online 62 35 -
62
Wet
S FIT AS +1349Why this score
Source S FIT AS Solus TA71 Reviews found online 59 41 -
52
Snow
Level52Why this score
Source S FIT AS Solus TA71 Reviews found online 41 41 -
66
Comfort
S FIT AS +1353Why this score
Source S FIT AS Solus TA71 Reviews found online 63 36 -
64
Noise
S FIT AS +559Why this score
Source S FIT AS Solus TA71 Reviews found online 61 48 -
69
Treadwear
S FIT AS +1356Why this score
Source S FIT AS Solus TA71 Professional tests (TWG score) 74 – Reviews found online 61 49 -
61
Handling
S FIT AS +2734Why this score
Source S FIT AS Solus TA71 Reviews found online 61 34
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S FIT AS | Kumho Solus TA71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 49 |
| Dry | 64 | 47 |
| Wet | 62 | 49 |
| Snow | 52 | 52 |
| Comfort | 66 | 53 |
| Noise | 64 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 56 |
| Handling | 61 | 34 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
S FIT AS
49
/ 100
Solus TA71
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Tire B Solus TA71
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong tread life longevity
Cons
- Occasional reports of vague steering or 'wandering' feel
- Mushy cornering stability during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet-weather traction for some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S FIT AS | B · Kumho Solus TA71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 5 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
49
/ 100
Kumho Solus TA71
Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 61 vs 34 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 64 vs 47 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 62 vs 49 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 66 vs 53 on comfort.
Tire A · Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.