Tests – · 1 test Owners 58 · 16 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 16 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Open Country WT is ahead, 75–62
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 58 · 16 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 5 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | S FIT AS | Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 79 |
S FIT AS: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
Open Country WT: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | S FIT AS | Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 77 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 83 |
S FIT AS: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62
Open Country WT: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 79
No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | S FIT AS | Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 40 | 74 |
S FIT AS: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 52
Open Country WT: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72
No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | S FIT AS | Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 77 |
S FIT AS: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 66
Open Country WT: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS or Open Country WT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | S FIT AS | Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 62 | – |
S FIT AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 65
No road tests of noise for S FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | S FIT AS | Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 74 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 75 |
S FIT AS: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 61.2 = 69
Open Country WT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | S FIT AS | Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 80 |
| Category | Laufenn S FIT AS | Toyo Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 75 |
| Dry | 64 | 75 |
| Wet | 62 | 79 |
| Snow | 52 | 72 |
| Comfort | 66 | 73 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
S FIT AS
Open Country WT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | S FIT AS | Open Country WT | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #15/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #5/8 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S FIT AS | B · Toyo Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 8 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 19″ |
Laufenn S FIT AS
Toyo Open Country WT
Winner: Toyo Open Country WT — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Open Country WT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Open Country WT scores 72 vs 52 on snow.
Toyo Open Country WT scores 80 vs 61 on handling.
Toyo Open Country WT scores 79 vs 62 on wet.
Toyo Open Country WT scores 75 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Toyo Open Country WT, 79 vs 62 on our wet score.
Toyo Open Country WT, 75 vs 64 on our dry score.
Toyo Open Country WT, 72 vs 52 on our snow score.
Toyo Open Country WT, 73 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology