Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn S FIT AS vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 16 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

S FIT AS leads, 64–61 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire ALaufenn

S FIT AS

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 58 · 16 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    S FIT AS +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceS FIT ASGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6258

    S FIT AS: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 62

    Wet

    S FIT AS +5
    57
    Why this score
    SourceS FIT ASGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5953

    S FIT AS: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 52

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceS FIT ASGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online40–

    S FIT AS: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 52

    No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    S FIT AS +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceS FIT ASGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6362

    S FIT AS: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 66

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceS FIT ASGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    S FIT AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 65

    No road tests of noise for S FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    S FIT AS +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceS FIT ASGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6164

    S FIT AS: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 61.2 = 69

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    S FIT AS +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceS FIT ASGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online6158
Scores at a glance
Laufenn S FIT AS vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn S FIT ASYokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 64 61
Dry 64 61
Wet 62 57
Snow 52 –
Comfort 66 65
Noise 65 –
Treadwear 69 65
Handling (owners) 61 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

S FIT AS

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A S FIT AS

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Good grip and handling in dry conditions

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
  • Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
  • Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
All owner themes in the S FIT AS review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn S FIT AS B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn S FIT AS

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Narrow edge: Laufenn S FIT AS — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 62 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 64 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

S FIT AS or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, S FIT AS or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Laufenn S FIT AS, 62 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, S FIT AS or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Laufenn S FIT AS, 64 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, S FIT AS or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, S FIT AS or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Laufenn S FIT AS, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology