Tests – · none yet Owners 84 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin City Grip 2 vs Pirelli Angel GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
City Grip 2 is ahead, 80–71
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
City Grip 2 +971Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 87 72 City Grip 2: 60% × 76 (est.) + 40% × 87 = 80
Angel GT: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71
No road tests of dry for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
84
Wet
City Grip 2 +1074Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 81 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 89 76 City Grip 2: 60% × 80.8 (est.) + 40% × 89.2 = 84
Angel GT: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74
No road tests of wet for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
76
Comfort
City Grip 2 +571Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 79 71 City Grip 2: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79 = 76
Angel GT: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.2 = 71
No road tests of comfort for City Grip 2 or Angel GT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
74
Treadwear
City Grip 2 +767Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 78 67 City Grip 2: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 74
Angel GT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
86
Handling (owners)
City Grip 2 +1472Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel GT Reviews found online 86 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin City Grip 2 | Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 71 |
| Dry | 80 | 71 |
| Wet | 84 | 74 |
| Comfort | 76 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
City Grip 2
71
/ 100
Angel GT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A City Grip 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Improved confidence and stability when cornering and leaning
- Solid mileage and tread longevity
Cons
- Slightly stiffer construction can reduce impact absorption or comfort on rough roads for certain riders
- Transmits noticeable road feedback and creases
- Requires a brief warm-up period of around 5 minutes to reach maximum stickiness
Tire B Angel GT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up times
- Enhances rider confidence and offers great handling performance
Cons
- Lower than expected mileage and rapid wear reported by some users
- Front tire shoulder wear issues on heavier sport-touring bikes if the correct 'A' spec is not used
- Handling and tracking complaints on certain lighter or specific bike models compared to stock tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin City Grip 2 | B · Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Michelin City Grip 2
71
/ 100
Pirelli Angel GT
Winner: Michelin City Grip 2 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin City Grip 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Angel GT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 86 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 84 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 80 vs 71 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 74 vs 67 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin City Grip 2
Tire B · Pirelli Angel GT
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
City Grip 2 or Angel GT?
Which is better in the wet, City Grip 2 or Angel GT?
Michelin City Grip 2, 84 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, City Grip 2 or Angel GT?
Michelin City Grip 2, 80 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, City Grip 2 or Angel GT?
Michelin City Grip 2, 76 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, City Grip 2 or Angel GT?
Michelin City Grip 2, 74 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology