Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 12 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Pirelli Angel GT vs Pirelli Angel ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 143 owner reviews. How we score
Angel GT leads, 71–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Angel GT +566Why this score
Source Angel GT Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 65 Angel GT: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 71
Angel ST: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
No road tests of dry for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
74
Wet
Angel GT +470Why this score
Source Angel GT Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 76 70 Angel GT: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 74
Angel ST: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of wet for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Comfort
Angel GT +368Why this score
Source Angel GT Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 71 68 Angel GT: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.3 = 71
Angel ST: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Angel GT or Angel ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Angel GT +264Why this score
Source Angel GT Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 66 63 Angel GT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66
Angel ST: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Angel GT +666Why this score
Source Angel GT Angel ST Reviews found online 72 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Pirelli Angel GT | Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 67 |
| Dry | 71 | 66 |
| Wet | 74 | 70 |
| Comfort | 71 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Angel GT
67
/ 100
Angel ST
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Angel GT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up times
- Enhances rider confidence and offers great handling performance
Cons
- Lower than expected mileage and rapid wear reported by some users
- Front tire shoulder wear issues on heavier sport-touring bikes if the correct 'A' spec is not used
- Handling and tracking complaints on certain lighter or specific bike models compared to stock tires
Tire B Angel ST
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and high cornering confidence
- Reliable and predictable wet weather performance
- Light, neutral steering and overall straight-line stability
Cons
- Rear tire tends to wear out suddenly or rapidly once it passes the halfway mark
- Requires a short warm-up time (2-5 minutes) to reach optimal grip
- Shorter total mileage lifespan reported by aggressive riders or heavy commuters
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Pirelli Angel GT | B · Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Pirelli Angel GT
67
/ 100
Pirelli Angel ST
Narrow edge: Pirelli Angel GT — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Pirelli Angel GT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Pirelli Angel GT scores 72 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Pirelli Angel GT scores 71 vs 66 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Pirelli Angel GT scores 74 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Pirelli Angel GT scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.
Tire A · Pirelli Angel GT
Tire B · Pirelli Angel ST
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Angel GT or Angel ST?
Which is better in the wet, Angel GT or Angel ST?
Pirelli Angel GT, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Angel GT or Angel ST?
Pirelli Angel GT, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Angel GT or Angel ST?
Pirelli Angel GT, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Angel GT or Angel ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology