Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 3 reviews
Michelin Cross Terrain looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Cross Terrain vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Cross Terrain leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Cross Terrain +268Why this score
Source Cross Terrain Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 71 68 Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
Geolandar SUV: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
No road tests of dry for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
Cross Terrain +272Why this score
Source Cross Terrain Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 75 73 Cross Terrain: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74
Geolandar SUV: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
No road tests of wet for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Comfort
Cross Terrain +565Why this score
Source Cross Terrain Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 70 61 Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70
Geolandar SUV: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Cross Terrain +865Why this score
Source Cross Terrain Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 78 65 Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 73
Geolandar SUV: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Cross Terrain +170Why this score
Source Cross Terrain Geolandar SUV Reviews found online 71 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Cross Terrain | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 69 |
| Dry | 70 | 68 |
| Wet | 74 | 72 |
| Comfort | 70 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Cross Terrain
Geolandar SUV
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Terrain
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage
- Superior quietness and ride comfort
- Reliable grip and performance in winter conditions
Cons
- Limited performance capabilities for high-speed or aggressive driving
- Discontinued product availability
- Performance bias favors winter conditions over dry or wet handling
Tire B Geolandar SUV
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Cross Terrain | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Cross Terrain
Yokohama Geolandar SUV
Narrow edge: Michelin Cross Terrain — better treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Cross Terrain rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar SUV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?
Michelin Cross Terrain, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?
Michelin Cross Terrain, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology