Michelin Cross Terrain looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Cross Terrain vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Cross Terrain leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Cross Terrain
Tire AMichelin

Cross Terrain

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 3 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Cross Terrain +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCross TerrainGeolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7168

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Cross Terrain +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCross TerrainGeolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7573

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    Cross Terrain +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCross TerrainGeolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7061

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 73

    Treadwear

    Cross Terrain +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCross TerrainGeolandar SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7865

    Cross Terrain: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 73

    Geolandar SUV: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Terrain. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Cross Terrain +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCross TerrainGeolandar SUV
    Reviews found online7170
Scores at a glance
Michelin Cross Terrain vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Cross TerrainYokohama Geolandar SUV
Relative Score 72 69
Dry 70 68
Wet 74 72
Comfort 70 65
Treadwear 73 65
Handling (owners) 71 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Cross Terrain

Geolandar SUV

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cross Terrain

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and overall mileage
  • Superior quietness and ride comfort
  • Reliable grip and performance in winter conditions

Cons

  • Limited performance capabilities for high-speed or aggressive driving
  • Discontinued product availability
  • Performance bias favors winter conditions over dry or wet handling
All owner themes in the Cross Terrain review

Tire B Geolandar SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • High level of ride comfort
  • Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes

Cons

  • Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
  • Not suitable for high-performance driving
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
All owner themes in the Geolandar SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Cross Terrain B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tiresSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Cross Terrain

Yokohama Geolandar SUV

Narrow edge: Michelin Cross Terrain — better treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Cross Terrain rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar SUV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Cross Terrain scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Cross Terrain
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cross Terrain or Geolandar SUV?

Michelin Cross Terrain, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology