tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW vs Nokian Outpost APT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 11 + 67 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: CrossClimate 2 AW 81, Outpost APT 80.

Check price on Amazon · CrossClimate 2 AW Check price on Amazon · Outpost APT
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate 2 AW

All Weather

± 5

Tests 85 · 3 tests Owners 80 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2024 TireRack All Season and Weather Tyre Test (snow braking)

Nokian Outpost APT
Tire BNokian

Outpost APT

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 85 · 67 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 85

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 AW +4
    81
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 AWOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests87≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online8189

    CrossClimate 2 AW: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 81.1 = 85

    Outpost APT: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 88.5 = 81

    No road tests of dry for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 79

    Wet

    Outpost APT +7
    86
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 AWOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests76≈ 82 (est.)
    Reviews found online8492

    CrossClimate 2 AW: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 84.3 = 79

    Outpost APT: 60% × 82.5 (est.) + 40% × 92.3 = 86

    No road tests of wet for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 90

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 AW +18
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 AWOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests100≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7673

    CrossClimate 2 AW: 60% × 100 + 40% × 76 = 90

    Outpost APT: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 AWOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7878

    CrossClimate 2 AW: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 78.1 = 75

    Outpost APT: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.3 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for CrossClimate 2 AW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 AWOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–69

    Outpost APT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Outpost APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Outpost APT +4
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 AWOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8087

    CrossClimate 2 AW: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 75

    Outpost APT: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 79

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 AW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    Outpost APT +5
    81
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 AWOutpost APT
    Reviews found online7681
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate 2 AWNokian Outpost APT
Relative Score 81 80
Dry 85 81
Wet 79 86
Snow 90 72
Comfort 75 75
Noise – 67
Treadwear 75 79
Handling (owners) 76 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

CrossClimate 2 AW

± 7

Outpost APT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate 2 AW

Pros

  • Significant upgrade in wet and dry handling over stock tires
  • Reliable year-round performance including light snow capability
  • Superior ride comfort and softness

Cons

  • Reduced cornering grip compared to dedicated performance all-season tires
  • Diminished bite in deeper snow (over 4 inches) or softer powder
  • Noticeable tread wear on heavy electric vehicles with high torque
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 AW review

Tire B Outpost APT

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in rain, standing water, and slush
  • Reliable winter performance with 3PMSF rating
  • Sturdy construction featuring tough, puncture-resistant sidewalls

Cons

  • Slightly increased road noise or hum compared to standard all-season tires
  • Firm or stiff ride quality, particularly with higher load-rated variants
  • Reduced grip on hard-packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Outpost APT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW B · Nokian Outpost APT
CategoryAll WeatherAll Season
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3037
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 21″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—700 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—47 - 51 psi
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW

Nokian Outpost APT

Too close to call: Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW and Nokian Outpost APT are within 2 points overall. Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW is stronger on snow and dry. Nokian Outpost APT is stronger on wet and treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW scores 90 vs 72 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nokian Outpost APT scores 86 vs 79 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW scores 85 vs 81 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nokian Outpost APT scores 79 vs 75 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nokian Outpost APT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate 2 AW or Outpost APT?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate 2 AW or Outpost APT?

Nokian Outpost APT, 86 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate 2 AW or Outpost APT?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW, 85 vs 81 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossClimate 2 AW or Outpost APT?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 AW, 90 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate 2 AW or Outpost APT?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate 2 AW or Outpost APT?

Nokian Outpost APT, 79 vs 75 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology