Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 119 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 24 road tests and 119 + 3,649 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate+ is ahead, 79–70
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 119 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)
Tests 79 · 24 tests Owners 60 · 3,649 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)
“Softer alternative to HANKOOK KINERGY 4S2? Searching for alternarive to HANKOOK KINERGY 4S2 Good day to you! I recently decided to move to all-season tires. After checking reviews, costs and availability I went for HANKOOK 4S2. But i find them VERY stiff and not comfortable at all. (245 40 18). Would you please recommend an alternative with a softer ride? I am in Europe. Cheers and thank you!”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 23 tests | 94 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 57 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 7–0 | 99% | 95% |
| Dry Braking (cool) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 96% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 100% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (cool) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 100% |
CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 78 = 87
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 56.5 = 72
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 23 tests | 81 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 64 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–5 | 93% | 97% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 3–4 | 94% | 95% |
| Wet Braking (cool) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 95% | 84% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–3 | 97% | 99% |
| Wet Handling (cool) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 96% |
CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.9 + 40% × 81.3 = 81
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 64.3 = 78
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 18 tests | 65 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 61 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 1–4 | 94% | 95% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 1–4 | 98% | 98% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 97% | 97% |
CrossClimate+: 60% × 65.5 + 40% × 73.2 = 69
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 79 + 40% × 61.3 = 72
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests | 71 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 55 |
CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77.6 = 75
Kinergy 4S2: 40% × 76.6 + 60% × 54.9 = 64
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 18 tests | 68 | 66 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–2 | 99% | 99% |
CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 67
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate+ or Kinergy 4S2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 9 tests | 83 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 59 |
| Wear (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 98% | 63% |
CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 79.5 = 82
Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 59.4 = 67
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 56 |
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 18 tests | 75 | 54 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–1 | 90% | 87% |
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate+ | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 70 |
| Dry | 87 | 72 |
| Wet | 81 | 78 |
| Snow | 69 | 72 |
| Comfort | 75 | 64 |
| Noise | 67 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 56 |
| Efficiency | 75 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
CrossClimate+
Kinergy 4S2
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 11 tests that ran both, Michelin CrossClimate+ finished ahead 7 times and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 4 times.
| Discipline | Category | CrossClimate+ | Kinergy 4S2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% | 95% | +4.1 | 7–0 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Braking (cool) | Dry | 96% | 100% | −4.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 99% | +0.5 | 3–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling (cool) | Dry | 100% | 100% | +0.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 70% #13/13 · 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test | 95% #3/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 93% | 97% | −4.4 | 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% | 95% | −0.6 | 3–4 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking (cool) | Wet | 95% | 84% | +10.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% | 99% | −1.3 | 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling (cool) | Wet | 100% | 96% | +4.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 60% #13/13 · 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test | 91% #6/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | – | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 100% #4/7 · 2020 ADAC SUV All Season Tyre Test | 92% #11/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 94% | 95% | −1.9 | 1–4 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% | 98% | −0.6 | 1–4 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 97% | 97% | −0.3 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 90% #2/4 · 2022 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 | 88% #8/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 99% | 0.0 | 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 98% | 63% | +34.4 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 90% | 87% | +3.1 | 4–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 68% | 88% | −20.1 | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #3/14 | #13/14 | – | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 84% | 72% | +12.0 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/9 | #6/9 | – | 7–4 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community members frequently view the Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 as a solid, budget-friendly alternative to premium all-weather tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2, highlighting its strong wet traction and good snow performance for the price. However, users report mixed experiences regarding tread longevity, with some noting rapid or uneven wear, as well as drawbacks such as highway humming noise, a stiff ride, and twitchy handling on ice.
“I had the Kinergy 4s2 tires and they were not good. They wore unevenly, especially on the outsides of the fronts and handling was poor. When cornering the tire felt like the sidewall was folding under which would explain the increased wear on the outside tread block of the tires . The alignment was verified to be perfect. Go with the CC2 or anything Nokian . I ran some old Nokian WRG2s and was very impressed. Id imagine the latest versions are also very good.”
“We're able to get the Kinergy 4S2 from Discount Tires (America's Tires) for less than half the price of. the Cross Climate 2's. We plan to give them a try on a Nissan LEAF and Prius Prime. Hot take: Hit the "found a lower price" feature on the Discount Tire site and see what they offer you! We were very pleasantly surprised!”
“Zimske gume - premium ili neka srednja klasa? Nakon 2 proklizavanja u skretanju ovaj vikend (po kiši) zaključila sam da je vrijeme da kupim nove gume. Otkako sam uzela auto (prosinac 2022.) imam jedne te iste cjelogodišnje gume, Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 225/45/R17. Prošlu zimu kad je bilo snijega jedva sam kući s posla išla koliko sam se klizala po ulici, kiša još nekako ali snijeg i led katastrofa. Ove godine je i na kiši počeo proklizavati. Auto je zadnji pogon, 115ks ništa specijalno. Ono što me zanima je koliko ima smisla uzeti neke premium gume obzirom da godišnje radim oko 15k kilometara, većinski po gradu (Slavonija), tu i tamo autoput do Zg, možda 2 puta godišnje Mađarska/Austrija/Slovenija. Vidim da svi hvale Continental Wintercontact TS870 ali poprilično su skupe pa imate li možda preporuku za nešto jeftinije, a kvalitetno? Više me zanima da su dobre za kišu jer snijega nema nešto specijalno i sve će biti bolje nego ove koje sad imam. Što se dimenzije tiče imam jedne alu felge pa bih onda uzela istu dimenziju čisto da se ne moram izut iz cipela zbog troškova s kupovanjem još i felgi. TLDR: Zimska guma, 225/45/R17, zadnji pogon, što kupiti? Read more”
Based on 33 community posts
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate+ | B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | 95 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 19″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 54 | 54 |
Michelin CrossClimate+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better efficiency, handling and dry. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 if snow matters most to you.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 54 on efficiency.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 72 vs 56 on handling.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 72 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 82 vs 67 on treadwear.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 won 5 of 5 shared straight aquaplaning tests.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 78 on our wet score.
Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 72 on our dry score.
Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 72 vs 69 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 54 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology