Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Michelin Energy Saver — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 1 road tests and 120 + 137 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate+ is ahead, 81–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate+

All Season

± 5

Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 120 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)

Michelin Energy Saver
Tire BMichelin

Energy Saver

Summer

± 7

Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 69 · 137 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (wear)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    CrossClimate+ +18
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate+Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 1 tests9471
    Reviews found online7767

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 77.4 = 87

    Energy Saver: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 67.1 = 69

  2. 81

    Wet

    CrossClimate+ +13
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate+Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 1 tests8169
    Reviews found online8167

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 81.2 = 81

    Energy Saver: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 66.5 = 68

  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate+Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests65–
    Reviews found online73–

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 65.1 + 40% × 72.8 = 68

  4. 75

    Comfort

    CrossClimate+ +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate+Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7767

    CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77.1 = 75

    Energy Saver: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    Energy Saver +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate+Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 1 tests6872
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    Energy Saver: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate+ or Energy Saver. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 82

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate+ +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate+Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests8374
    Reviews found online8074

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 82

    Energy Saver: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 74.3 = 74

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate+ +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate+Energy Saver
    Reviews found online7264
  8. 74

    Efficiency

    Energy Saver +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate+Energy Saver
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 1 tests7475
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Michelin Energy Saver: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate+Michelin Energy Saver
Relative Score 81 70
Dry 87 69
Wet 81 68
Snow 68 –
Comfort 75 68
Noise 67 70
Treadwear 82 74
Handling (owners) 72 64
Efficiency 74 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

CrossClimate+

± 7

Energy Saver

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossClimate+Energy SaverΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% #2/4 · 2022 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 92% #13/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #2/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test 98% #7/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% #8/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test 95% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 90% #2/4 · 2022 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 89% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/4 · 2022 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 95% #16/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test 99% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 94% #3/14 · 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 95% #2/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 89% #6/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test 88% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 76% #9/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test 67% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #3/14 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test #2/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 75% #10/14 · 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 69% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #2/4 2022 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 #5/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate+

Pros

  • Strong snow and cold-weather traction for an all-season tyre, with many owners reporting winter-tyre-like confidence on snow, slush and hills, including on front-wheel-drive cars.
  • Excellent dry handling and steering response with precise, summer-tyre-like feel, along with generally very good wet grip and braking.
  • Long tread life: many reports of 30,000–55,000+ km or miles with low wear, including taxi and van use and 4-year/50,000-mile ownership.

Cons

  • Performance degradation with age: several owners report grip (wet and snow), noise and ride deteriorating after about 1–2 years, with hardening or cracking of the rubber in some cases.
  • Limitations on ice, packed snow and deep or steep snow, where some owners found them inferior to dedicated winter tyres or to rivals such as the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
  • Wet-weather concerns for some, including aquaplaning, being pulled around by standing water, and scary steering feel as the tyres aged.
All owner themes in the CrossClimate+ review

Tire B Energy Saver

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Low road noise and high levels of driving comfort

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip and traction, especially as the tires age
  • Prone to dry rotting, cracking, and hardening after a few years
  • Poor performance and sliding in cold or winter conditions
All owner themes in the Energy Saver review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate+ B · Michelin Energy Saver
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available634
Rim diameters13″ – 19″15″ – 16″
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate+

Michelin Energy Saver

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Michelin Energy Saver if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 81 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 82 vs 74 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 72 vs 64 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate+ or Energy Saver?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate+ or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate+ or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, CrossClimate+ or Energy Saver?

Michelin Energy Saver, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate+ or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate+ or Energy Saver?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 74 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, CrossClimate+ or Energy Saver?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology