Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 152 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin CrossClimate vs Vredestein Quatrac 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 6 road tests and 152 + 669 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: CrossClimate 74, Quatrac 5 73.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 73 · 669 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)
“A guy on YouTube vlogged his experience with the quatrac 5 in his mirage. It's a good all weather tire for the occasional blast of snow but is by no means a substitute for actual snow tires.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, CrossClimate won 3 and Quatrac 5 won 0 (average 100% vs 92% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured dry handling for both, CrossClimate won 3 and Quatrac 5 won 0 (average 100% vs 100% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, CrossClimate won 3 and Quatrac 5 won 0 (average 95% vs 93% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured wet handling for both, CrossClimate won 3 and Quatrac 5 won 0 (average 98% vs 97% of the best).
- In 3 tests that measured snow braking for both, CrossClimate won 2 and Quatrac 5 won 0 (average 92% vs 91% of the best).
-
76
Dry
CrossClimate +472Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 6 tests 78 72 Reviews found online 74 72 Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 100% 92% Dry Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 100% 100% CrossClimate: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 73.5 = 76
Quatrac 5: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 71.5 = 72
-
76
Wet
Level76Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 6 tests 75 75 Reviews found online 78 77 Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 96% 91% Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 95% 93% Wet Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 98% 97% CrossClimate: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 77.8 = 76
Quatrac 5: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 77.3 = 76
-
69
Snow
Quatrac 5 +170Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests 71 70 Reviews found online 65 71 Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–0 92% 91% Snow Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–1 96% 96% CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 65.4 = 69
Quatrac 5: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 70.6 = 70
-
74
Comfort
CrossClimate +173Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 76 74 CrossClimate: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
Quatrac 5: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
No road tests of comfort for CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
Quatrac 5 +170Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests 71 73 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0 98% 98% CrossClimate: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
Quatrac 5: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate or Quatrac 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
CrossClimate +173Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 74 74 Reviews found online 75 71 Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 91% 92% CrossClimate: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 74.9 = 74
Quatrac 5: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 71.3 = 73
-
73
Handling (owners)
Quatrac 5 +376Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac 5 Reviews found online 73 76 -
76
Efficiency
CrossClimate +1066Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests 76 66 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 94% 91%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate | Vredestein Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 73 |
| Dry | 76 | 72 |
| Wet | 76 | 76 |
| Snow | 69 | 70 |
| Comfort | 74 | 73 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 76 |
| Efficiency | 76 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
CrossClimate
73
/ 100
Quatrac 5
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 11 tests that ran both, Michelin CrossClimate finished ahead 10 times and Vredestein Quatrac 5 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | CrossClimate | Quatrac 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% | 92% | +7.6 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 100% | +0.4 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% | 91% | +4.5 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% | 93% | +1.9 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 97% | +1.1 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 92% | 91% | +1.0 | 2–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% | 96% | +0.5 | 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 98% | +0.7 | 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 91% | 92% | −0.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% | 91% | +2.3 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #4/10 | #3/10 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 65% | 85% | −19.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 All Season Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/9 | #7/9 | – | 10–1 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 175/65 R14 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossClimate
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable traction in light snow and cold conditions
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones in the tread pattern
- Noticeable drop in performance as tread depth decreases
- Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer tires
Tire B Quatrac 5
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in wet conditions and winter weather (snow and ice)
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Good year-round versatility eliminating the need for seasonal tire swaps
Cons
- Faster or uneven tread wear reported by some users, particularly on the outer edges
- Softer sidewalls can induce a 'squishy' feel or slight loss of steering feedback
- Less aggressive dry-pavement handling compared to dedicated summer tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin CrossClimate
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Vredestein Quatrac 5
Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac 5 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong value, quiet comfort, and capable year-round traction. While recognized as a solid 3PMSF-rated all-weather tire, several users note that it cannot match dedicated winter tires in heavy snow and that tread wear can be rapid due to soft rubber compounds.
bobistheoilguy.com
·1 upvote ·2020-09-19
“I'm a big fan of their tires. I ran a few sets on an old Camry and they performed well in Northeast hills and 4 seasons. I currently have set of Quatrac 5's 225 60 18 on the Outback. Standing water could be better but it is good; dry pavement and traction is excellent; works very well with AWD in the snow. Only issue I've had to complain about is longevity with the softer compounds. But that's also a part of why it performs so well right?”
r/autoadvies
·7 upvotes ·2026-09-10
“Vredestein quatrac 5. Gaat vaker vervellen richting einde levensduur. Als het op 1 plek is en er geen canvas zichtbaar is loopt het niet zon vaart. Aan de andere kant zijn ze aardig op (en begint uitgedroogd/ verbrand te worden) dus zou ik ze binnenkort vervangen. Zeker ni het natte najaar en daarna de winter komt.”
vwvortex.com
·2019-10-22
“They're both junk, but the Hankook is particularly poor in wet or snowy conditions. I replaced the Hankook tires on the S MT that my kids drive with Vredestein Quatrac 5s (on some 16 x 7 Passat wheels) and it was well worth the money.”
Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Tread wear and longevity#Affordable price and value#Wet and dry handling#Road noise and comfort#All-weather 3PMSF performance
Based on 93 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate | B · Vredestein Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 63 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Michelin CrossClimate
73
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac 5
Too close to call: Michelin CrossClimate and Vredestein Quatrac 5 are within 2 points overall. Michelin CrossClimate is stronger on efficiency and dry.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 66 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate scores 76 vs 72 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 5
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossClimate or Quatrac 5?
Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate or Quatrac 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 76 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate or Quatrac 5?
Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossClimate or Quatrac 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, CrossClimate or Quatrac 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate or Quatrac 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, CrossClimate or Quatrac 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Which rolls more easily, CrossClimate or Quatrac 5?
Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 66 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology